High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Kasturi Rang Ojha & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Kasturi Rang Ojha & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Criminal Miscellaneous No.28858 of 2011
                   1.    Kasturi Rang Ojha
                   2.    Adya Nand Ojha
                         Both sons of Late Ram Prasad Ojha, resident of village -
                         Dehura, P.S. - Asaon, District - Siwan.
                                                                 --------- Petitioners.
                                               Versus
                   The State of Bihar                            ---Opposite Party
                                               *****

02. 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in

connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 09/2011, for

the offences under Sections 418/420/423/424 /426/465/468

of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Siwan.

Petitioners are named accused in this case

instituted on the basis of complaint case no. 3031/2010 with

allegation of executing a sale deed for substantial

consideration in favour of the complainant, a lady, who

subsequently got information that the petitioner defrauded by

stating that her mother got the land through deed of gift, but,

there is nothing of the kind.

Submission is that in fact petitioner was

cheating they had in fact gone to execute a

deed of entrustment for limited
period in favour of husband of the complainant but, in place

thereof sale deed has been executed for that recently (about

four years). The suit has been filed by the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

case, they appear not entitled for the privilege sought.

Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the

petitioner is hereby rejected.

As prayed, petitioners may surrender before the

court below within fortnight and seek regular bail, their

prayer may be considered on its own merit without being

prejudice of instant refusal.

( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
Rajeev/-