Gujarat High Court High Court

Katiyabhai vs State on 3 May, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Katiyabhai vs State on 3 May, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/5071/2011	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 5071 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1873 of 2006
 

 
=====================================
 

KATIYABHAI
NEVABHAI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

===================================== 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH JAIL for Applicant(s) :
1, 
MR KARTIK PANDYA, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for
Respondent(s) : 2, 
=====================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P. P. BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 03/05/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

1.0 Learned
Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Pandya made available for perusal a
communication dated 27th April 2011 from the Medical
Officer, Vadodara Central Jail to the Superintendent, Vadodara
Central Jail. Present Certificate (Communication) is dated 27th
April 2011, whereas, along with application, the applicant has
enclosed the Certificate (Communication) dated 28th March
2011.

2.0 The
reason for calling for the latest Medical Report was to find out as
to whether there is any improvement in the condition of the convict.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor asked for time to find out
telephonically. Hence, the matter was kept in the second half.

2.1 In
second half, on telephonic instructions,
the learned Additional Public Prosecutor States that there is no
improvement in the condition of the convict since 28th
March 2011 till 27th April 2011.

3.0 In
view of that it is deemed proper that the convict be released on
Temporary Bail so as to enable him to take treatment from a private
Doctor of his choice. The conviction is under Sections 302, 394 and
34 of the Indian Penal Code. That being so, there is no question of
the convict having an occasion of enjoying furlough leave. The
convict has undergone 05 years, 10 months and 19 days as on 7th
April 2011.

4.0 Looking
to the contents of the communication from the Medical Officer,
Vadodara Central Jail it is deemed fit that the applicant be granted
Temporary Bail.

5.0 Rule.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Pandya waives service of
process of Rule.

6.0 Taking
into consideration the contents of the application, the application
is allowed. The applicant – convict is ordered to be released on
Temporary Bail for a period of 30 days from the date of
his release, on his executing a personal bond of Rs.5,000/-
(Rupees Five Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the jail
authorities.

6.1 It
is directed that the applicant – convict shall mark his
presence before the nearest Police Station on every Monday.

6.2 The
applicant – convict shall surrender to the jail authorities on
expiry of the Temporary Bail period.

6.3 Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

[
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. ]

[
P. P. Bhatt, J. ]

hiren

   

Top