High Court Kerala High Court

Kattilichalil Lakshmi vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 17 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kattilichalil Lakshmi vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 17 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 646 of 2010()


1. KATTILICHALIL LAKSHMI, AGED 37 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JAISON JOSEPH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :17/03/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 646 of 2010
               ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of March, 2010

                           O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under

Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is

the accused in Crime No.71/2010 of Nedumbassery Police

Station, Ernakulam.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 419, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 12(1)(b)(d) of the Passport Act.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

5/03/2010, the following order was passed;

“After having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, I am

of the view that before disposing of the Bail

Application, an opportunity should be given to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating officer.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating officer

at 9 A.M. on 9/3/2010 and 10/3/2010. The

B.A. No. 646/2010
2

petitioner shall produce a copy of the order before

the investigating officer.

Post on 17/3/2010.

It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor

that the petitioner will not be arrested until further

orders in connection with Crime No.71 of 2010 of

Nedumbassery Police Station.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor that the

petitioner has complied with the direction contained in the order

dated 5/03/2010.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

her on bail on her executing bond for Rs.10,000/- with two

solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

B.A. No. 646/2010
3

A) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence;

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm