Gujarat High Court High Court

Kaushal vs State on 30 August, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Kaushal vs State on 30 August, 2011
Author: M.R. Shah,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/2212/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2212 of 2011
 

 
======================================


 

KAUSHAL
KUMUDCHANDRA SHAH - Applicant
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 3 - Respondents
 

======================================
Appearance : 
MR
ASHISH M DAGLI for the Applicant. 
MR KP RAWAL, APP for Respondent
No.1. 
None for Respondent Nos.2 -
4. 
====================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 30/08/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ, order and/or
direction, directing the respondent Police Agency and passport
authority – respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith decide the
representation of the petitioner dated 07/12/2010 (Annexure “E”)
and subsequent reminders.

2. As
it is reported that request made by the petitioner to take necessary
action against a lady namely Rajshri D/O Vijaykumar Kesari alias
Vitthalbhai Makwana and W/o Japmandeepsingh Ahluwalia to run away
abroad due to involvement of serious criminal case of having two
passports issued from two different authorities one passport issued
from Ahmedabad in the year 2009 and another passport issued from
Chandigarh in the year 2008, is yet not looked into and decided by
the said authorities, the present petition is disposed of by
directing the concerned respondent authorities i.e. respondent Nos.2
and 3 to look into the aforesaid complaint/ representation made by
the petitioner if the same is not considered and decided by the
appropriate authority as on today and take appropriate steps in
accordance with law and on merits at the earliest, for which, this
Court has not expressed anything on merits with respect to the same.

With
this, the present petition is disposed of. Direct service is
permitted.

[M.R.SHAH,J]

*dipti

   

Top