Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Khemabhai vs Rural on 23 March, 2011
Author: Mr. K.S.Radhakrishnan,&Nbsp;Honourable Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/666/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 666 of 2008
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6149 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 7675 of 2008
 

In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 666 of 2008
 

======================================


 

KHEMABHAI
MOHANBHAI PATEL & 2 - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

DIRECTOR,
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING & 

 

RURAL
FINANCE & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

======================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
PRAKASH K JANI for Appellant(s) : 1 - 3. 
MR. K.T. DAVE,
ASSTT.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, 
NOTICE SERVED for
Respondent(s) : 2 - 3. 
MR DILIP B RANA for Respondent(s) :
4, 
====================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE                MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR. JUSTICE MOHIT S. SHAH
		
	

 

			Date
: 10/09/2008 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN)

The
case of the appellants is that respondent No.4 undertook foreign
travel at the substantial expenses of the Agricultural Produce Market
Committee, Patan, without any proper approval, but respondents Nos. 1
to 3 are not taking any steps for recovery of the amount from
respondent No.4.

2.
Counsel for respondent No.4 states that respondent No.4 is prepared
to deposit 50% of the amount spent towards foreign travel, so as to
give quiets to the entire dispute. On going through the averments
made by both the parties, we also feel the Market Committee was in no
way benefited by the foreign travel of 4th respondent.

3. There
is no dispute about the fact that Rs. 5.25 lakhs was spent towards
the foreign tour by respondent No.4. Considering the facts and
circumstances, we are inclined to give direction to respondent No.4
to deposit Rs. 2,72,500/- to settle the issue once for all. If any
amount has already been deposited by respondent No.4, the same shall
be adjusted towards the above amount, and the remaining amount shall
be deposited in two equal instalments, within two months from today,
failing which it is open to the petitioners to move this Court again.

4.
With the aforesaid direction, the Appeal stands disposed of.
Consequently, Civil Application also stands disposed of.

(K.S.

Radhakrishnan, C.J.)

(M.S.

Shah, J.)

*/Mohandas

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.134 seconds.