In THE HIGH coum on TKARNATAKA xr
omen was THE 20th mien _ %
BE!-'only: é
THE I-IOWBLE Mrz'..:1;s'nt:EIc : %
cnoncmis: %
amen ma.
1. "i{Ht.'V?l:'(J'!3U'!iiI)'ii~I'V:('.!!-l_ollC!alE
43: ms." 3.15% No.317V1. mm
Bmzmm
11: um Auammn KHWUBUDDIN cannons
_ M 45 YRS, mza. Dn~; c;4.A*mL-.
Mama. R/0 KATAYYA. F@.O'I'WARE
KHANAPUR 220:4) ._ A ---- *
cm? BE-LGAUM om " .. RESPONDENT
(By sri vitsminaawfi-R 3* éHAs'rR1. ADV & V.S.GUNJAL ADV)
'~'V:I'!-HS PDTI'iTGN I8 FILED UNDER SECTION 115 CPO
. "«AGAlN8T.¢'l'HE ORDER DATED 27-8-2005 PASSED IN HRCRP
51' [@002 ONVTHE FILE OF I ADDL.DIS'l'RICT JUDGE. BELGAUM
"-DISM!.$Sl'N£§-TH-E REVISION PE'I'I'l'l0N FILED AGAINST THE
A ORDER'~DA7§'ED 30-3-2002 PASSED I-N HRC 140.232] 1989 ON
'T.HEV_*F'3.L?7J OF I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JRHDN) BELGAUM
D'iSM1.SSING THE P'x'51'l'I'l'10N FILED U/S 21(1)(H) OF' KRC ACT
J{u/'s2*'I(2)(R) ow KR ACT) FOR EVICTION.
"AA'._'1I{:R3PNo,§3_§' 1%
E BETWEEN;
KHUTUBUDDIN RAJESAB CI-IONCHE
SINCE DEAD BY LRS. 3%
111
lb
lo
Id
MAINUDDIN KI-IUTUBUDDIN CHONCI-IE ; .
43 ms. R/A No.3l71. CI-IAJJU GALLI 1. ~
BELGAUM 590 002 é %
aw AHAMMAD Kuunmunmfl wAn1
EA "BELGAUM -- 590 001
* ac_ 'mR1AMB1AuAs MARIYA-Z
MOHAMMED YUSUF MADIWAL
62 YRS. R/O CLUB ROAD
BEDGAUM 590 001
' ld RABHEEDA HAMMA SHAIKH
53 YRS, E-142A. AZAM NAGAR
Ih
SANGNEM - GOA
swam Musrm com: _
so ms. 1 MAIN ROAD I
xoaamncmm. BANGALORE'-__
MAIRUNNESA NISSARA.' ED "
SHAIKH
43 YRS. KHARI MAD] MMJH) Bwcxx " "
SAVARDA-GOA
FEMIDA JAVEDKH-.AJwl._ .
40 ms, R/O c-7, 134.
ccq coumax
BAFAL RM, 'FATi:BOOPE:'
M.UMBé\I4<§0 035:'
Jarréalafii 'BtIAIIIUBIII5i)'III'*€I1HIiIi§C'IIE
mo KHUWBUDDIN ononcm:
75 YRS-,f.R/07'N6.75,_MARKE'f STREET
IBELGAW001
.. Pmrrxonsns
" any ad mmgnxsm aunarrmr. Adv.)
%'I'I-I-E
' VDISMISSING TI-IE PETITION FILED U/S 21(1)(I-I) OF KRC AC'-I'
[U/S '27[2)(R) OF KR AC1') FOR EVICTION.
" KHATAL ABDULIIJETSHAIKH I
. MMQR.,R,I.O'-N0.85.MARKET gram'
=v;:Am=f a,gLGApr.g- 590 001
.-. RESPONDENT
' 'eaysnV1é§;1§EsHwAR s sunsmx, ADV & V.8.GUNJAL ADV]
,. THIS PETITION I8 FILED UNDER SECTION I15 CFC
AAGAINST' THE ORDER DATED Q7'-8-2005 PASSED IN HRCRP
.. A 4%/.2002 ON THE FILE OF' I ADDL.DIS'I'RlC.'!I' JUDGE. BELGAUM
rDI$fMI-SSING THE REVISION PETITION FILED AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 30-3-2002 PASSED IN I-[RC No.f33.1/1989 ON
ADDLCIVIL JUDGE (JR=.DN) BELGAUM
FILE OF I
1.?
IIBREHQELZE
EEIKEENL
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
KH-UTUBUDDIN mama caoncmé' * A __ M 1
la
31-,7.
mmunnm xHmuB1mnn:_'cuoud1~m$kk]
49 ms. R/A No.3.l71. cw-.a.ui.' mm
Bmz.oAu=M59ooq2~V~._ f & ,
mu mama xHpi1uBuba1n:«¢5§<3ucHE
46 ms, No.29. c;:::.m_A;Pm_<:oLon1r
unnnuu-.z::3 _ W
mm . aim
%AVMoHAM%MEz)_ lwazwlu.
62 YR85*R/0;Ci.!JB«.ROAD.
a_BE.LGAUi'a*3':$ % .. %
léxsimnba
49 Y'R8,'vF.-l-$9!» '
% ~ sguonm 'amoeb-
s.svmA com;
h %5o%'ir;4sm.a~ was ROAD
._é%f§$QI45K-MAISGAM, anumwnu ~
r4IAi7zii:3iiNEsA mam an
M . 43 ms.xHAR1 mm mum) BLOCK
MUMBAI 4'00 086
shvmm -- om
FEMIDA JAVEDKHAN
40 was, we 0-7. 134
coo commsx %
-BA!-ML-RM. PM' (30095:
lh JAINABBI HATUBUDDIN GHONCHE
W/0 KHUIUBUDDIN GHONCI-IE .
76 YRS, R/0 No.75, MAR-KE'l"B'~l'RE
CAMP,BELGAUM590001
(By an 3:293-2902 rasasn IN mac mas: 1969 on
THE FILE 'or' JUDGE (mom mm-uu
oxsunasma mum; man we muum on mac par
(u/3 2712113) orexn%4p.cn.peaLsv:cnou.
X _ m;zfru{Buoti»s%RA:sana cuoucua
amen ps.s:)%93v ms.
18.. ~. mainunnm xuu-waumam caoucnp
as was. R/-A No.3!-71, cmwumu.1
BELGAUM 590 002
tn' % mu anmmnoxuuruauomu woman
46 YRS, No.29, G KARIAPPA COLON'!
NANDWADI
BELGAUM - 590 001
.10 MARIAHBI ALIAS NARWA2
MOHAMMED YUSUF MADIWAL
62 YRS, R/O CLUB ROAD
BELGAUM-GK) 001
1d RASHEEDAAHAIMASIW A
49YRB,_E-l42A.AZAMHr%flAR
SANGNEM-GOA % A
to swap. MusrmNao;:Ax. kAAj~A%%
50YRS.IMMN-RGAD' %
xommnmuu, ~
If
43 YRS; MADE Llii3AJJiD.
is FEMiEA'JFW.ED1iliAN' *
k%4o~v%as;:%n/orjcw,134
ccQ.C033{H._._E:§ % ._
BAFAL'fi3'A'I'GGiQPE %
n. J % % JAIMBBI mmauomu GHOIICHE
, we %x1w*ruBUn~nm%%%cnoNcHa» .
* ms, R/O'ii6;?5, mnxmjtsrnzm .
cmn«anxmuu%sm om .. mmomns %
¢g,»a.m amucmsnm smsrnv. Adv.)
f KIJATAEABDUL MU % %
%muon.Vn/o No.85.-MARl(E'l'~B'I'R-EB'-I' % %
_ BELGRUM 590 001 T .. RESPONDENT
£By.8n' mommsumn s smsm. mv a.v;a.oun.nu_.Anvp
ma P.E'I'l'l'IO.N 1 man UHDER seem» us are
Ammsr THE ORDER mmn 27-s-2005 meant: IN anon?
....a'.
50/9002 ON THEFILE OF' I ADD!-a.Dl8'I'RlC'l'
DISMISBING THE REVISION PETITION F1LED"-AGJGNBT
ORDER DATED 80-3v-2002 PASSED IN. HRG"'Na.231f1989
THE FILE OF I ADDL.C»lVlL ._ BELWLM T
DISMISBING 'PH PETITION FILED U/.8 '2:l(1[(l-1). 0F'VvKRCw.!£$T '
(U/S 27(2).[R) OF KR ACT) FOR EVl(1'2'l§1fl.._ A'
smcm DEAD BY ms. "
la MMNUDDIH1KH{LfiU Bi§§3I§iIei'CHONe;9§IE V
43 71-23. rm. I!o.3l'H."'CHA.J,JU emu
BE:LGM.!_M--..$99'0Q_2!____" .
lb CHOIICHE
7 46 1'36, Hogs.-, G~KB.Rlfi.PPA" comm
M %
"=BELGfl.UM~.-"-A-590 40'e.1' %
KHUTUBUDDIN
lo MhRlAa!Bl_ALL$S~§§flRlYAZ
MOHJAMHED vusurr mmnwu.
. ea ms.a;o cum ROAD ~
* _i.fB.EL(.3AUM
% = :i_d~ _ "V-.l§ASH:IT-'IEDA HAMMA aumcn
YRS."-E-l49A. AZAM mama %
aha-'mmu - GOA
1; . gmm MUBTAN com:
.'_5oYRs.lMAlNROAD %
"xommumm, aamaawns
«M mmununsa mesamumnn
SHAIKH
43 YRS. KHARI HAD! MAJ-HD BLOCK
SAVARDA -- GOA
% MAJOR, R10 .KA5t_'AYYA ;Fouaqw¢a§;
1; FEMIDA aavmnxum
40 was, 1210 (3-7, 134
OCQ COMPLEX
BAFAL RAJ. FA-'1' coon; %
MUMBM -coo oas
1n ammaan Mnmaunnm cuomna
mo xn%uwaunnmcHcucum%% V
76 ms, R10 m.7%s,mx-mwrsmmm
cam. nmanung 590 '.«,.PE1115fi0NER8
(By ed 0 %s.H%$8rnv. Adi»
NARAYANMGU£sAiJP1'€TlLg Ak
KHAHAI-'UR Rm-\D""-~._»
CAMP__Ef"E1.GfiU!é!_§90 qa1 % .. RESPONDENT
(By mdniémsafitfi-R ADV & V.B.GUNJM. ADV)
'-'r1--ns% PE.'I1'TI.;ON"'~18"'«FiLED UNDER sucnou 115 cpc
ACMI-N8'l'..THI£ 0%RDER,l3«1\TED 27-3-zoos PASSED IN I-I-RCRP
swoon 0'i*lfI'HE.FILE-OFlA=DDL.Dl81'RlCP JUDGE. Banmuu
Di;;SM'i88l'NG was REVISION m1-non men AGAINSI' ms
-maingn mm: Pnssnn IN mac No.23:/19e9 on
{run [f¥LE«._0F I ADm..cML JUDGE (JR.DN) BELGAUIJ
nasnmsssawa -'ma: PE'|'!'l1ON mm: was 21113111) on me AC1'
% -gu1s~g?g:;;;zz;.ear KR ACT') FOR mac-non.
C "Kl-jlUTUBUDDIN RMESAB cuoncuz
amen new 31! LR-B. ~
111 MAINUDDIN KHUTU-BUDDIII CI-IONGHEE
48 YRS. R/A M13171. C
lb
ld
BELGAUM590002 '% 2 _
mu Aammm xuuwaumxn cnoncanj 3 % k %
46YRs.No.29.oKAmAPPAvceLmrr "
NANDWADI .
BELGAUM - 590 001
MARIAMBI ALIAS Mamba,
MOHAMMED YUSUF MADIWAL
62 YRS. R/O CLUB ROAD
B-mmuu 590 no; _
RASHEEDA HAIlIi.1It.'3i¥iAl§{PI A. _
49 ms. E4425. my raasam-%*««.% ._
8ANGN!3££-_-_GOA"""'*..'« ; 1
so YR3,"!.HfiI1NRQA?.»DV"--.' % * A
Kommmmm. Ba muons
--~HAl_Rl'1'NNEaA. msmmimunn
SHAIKH. &
ms. HEAR: * Jjli' MAJJID BLOCK
mvar-rm' "
mason mravfibki-an
' " 40 723,310 (:42 184
" 1 C09 comrwx'
T NARAYAN uouuu PATIL
muoa. R/O KATAWA rvoorrwmaxn
BAFAL RM. FAT OGOPE
.:,_1uu-Ma.~A._1_ am can
wrruaunnm cnonu E
W I O KHUIUBUDDIN GI-IONCHE
--;76'vi2s, R/O No.75, mam cream'
~~ _ 'amp. BELGAUM 590 001
.. PE'l'l'l'l0NER8
[By Bri G BALAKRISHNA 8!-IABTRY. Adv.)
;'
KHANAPUR ROAD
CAMP BELGAUM ago om .. ' =
(By Bri vranuzsuwm s SHABTRI. ADV gs vfs.aua.mAuy.%% é " ; n
THIS mmon I8 mum sncr:imV' £15"
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27-'E.-21205 Phflfiflfl 'IN FHRCRP
53/2002 ON THE FILE OF IVADDLDISTRICP J¥JD€i§$--..:BELG\lIML'
DISMISSING THE nmws:on%i%ps:!n11oN%L%mm3% £€ZlMN8'l' THE
ommn DATED so-a-2002 Pnsarmm Hm; No.2$2/1989 on
THE FILE on 1 ArJnL.cM:.-.. gamma; Bstmuu
msmssmc we mmou: mLnn%.gws.21(1;¢m or me AC1'
(U/S 27(2)[R) or KR new ma _ ' V
KHU'I'UBl:.i'£)D§¥l'V5:".;lRA.;Vl"I'~'.fit\B'
SINCE An.-m;;.;av
la Ma1HIJ1ii*mi F Dm caoucm:
as me. 3/»mo.a.1t7 mnwu (mu
BEWAW mo
:1; MM AHAMMAD KHUTUBUDDIN CHONCHE
i as me. No.29, 'G xampm comm
Nmnwann
% Bsmuuu - 590 am
1" ~. V"'r§éisR1i§"nI?i31AuAs unnnmz
VMOHAMMED YUSUF MADIWAL
69' 'ms. R/O CLUB ROAD
~. V BELGAUM 590 001
" ~ 'la, vmsummna HANNA smuxn
53 YRS. E-MBA. AZAM NAGAR
SANGNEM - GOA
'T 11: samm MUSTAN mum:
50 YRS, I MAIN ROAD
KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE
1r MAIRUNNBSA NISSARAHADIED _ V
smuxu % \4
43YR8..l{.HARl MAD: Mlkl-.J1l3?BLQCl€;
SAVARDA--(3OA * "
1; FEMIDA JAVEDKHAN * M
- 4OYR8,R/0 ca, 134 '
cog coumax
BAFAL RM. FA-'Vl':"G00PE""' - =
MUMBAl40008w'é._
lh aamasaxkua11IBUmN%c1-Eonae:iu§Ik%
w/0 xuwn1aunmnc;aoracHn %
76 N35; No.*'T5,::MARIiE'l'
CAEP,'-.3E1¢Q.AUM §9Q..0O._: 1_j V .. Pmmnnas
cmumaamsmm. -Mk.)
NARA?AN'MOU!Jfl.1'PA'?!i}'
' MMOR."'Rl0 FQUIWARE
Kl-IAHARJ-R max): . %
cw? asmauu 590 001 RBSPONDENP
« sf: jwfisflunsiiifia s smsma. ADV a. v.s.oun.uu. ADV) %
i;'.°s*rmon 13 mm!) UNDER awnon 115 em
= %p.cwns*r%1'r:z oannn nmzn 274:-9005 meant) IN 1-mam»
THE FILE OF I ADDLDIHPRICP JUDGE, BELCMIJH
Di3Hi88lilG THE REVISION PENHON 'HLED AGAINST' THE
ORfiER'~ DATED '30-3-2002 PASSED [H I.-IRE .ND.232[19B9 ON
* ~ .132 "FILE 'or I Am>1..cML JUDGE (J=R.DN; ammuu
_ omussmc: mm mmon man we -zxuum on AC1'
' _ 'ans 27:23:12) or KR nan won nvzcmon.
THESE' mrmous HAVING amen mssavzo won
cam:-ms. comm on non PRONOUHGEMENT on
ORDERS Tl-I18 DAY, THE COURT MADE THE" FOLLOWING:
an-3-2002 passed in like Mg. 25$
on confirmed
by the Non.47 -up
in that the peflfiuneu
:mu.g.e2a9;a9, 231/39; and 2a2;a9 an the
file [Jr Dvn] Belgium which came
hm filed Hnmmuoa. 43. 47 and 51
X _ on the file of-the I mu. mum Judge,
.mm'% The 1 Add-l.Diat:-lot Judge. flawed the
. V!-[R.C=§iP 4312002 axiaing out of H120 No-($519189. hmrcvur
the HRCRP nos. 47 and 51 df200'2 amingout of
mac Nos. 231 and 232 ongso. -Aggrieved by the-quid-older
ofd-hmiualofeviction-petitions I-[RC Non. 231 nnd232of
-
[I ,_,…
1939 which is confirmed in HRCRP 47 and 51e!f2é.iiZ::j;evthe
Noa.536 a. 535/2005 mnpacflwly. .
1 mmmeniet Judgc,
couxt dated 2a-03-2002 A1eFekk’j%HRceeV% No; e2.a1;e1eee.,.. M.
Non.13.15 and 15 e.:;me= so of “The
onier paeaea in nncree; 332% 13, 15 and 16 in
HRCRP the said LA: filed by
antler posting the manner
for jeaguent them to -produce additional
aeeemente PW-1 to lead his furthcr euuenee
A be which one: has been confirmed’ by the
%% court in HRRP-Noa.542 no 54412005 and 545
to neepecuveny.
4. The helm:
§thc Dintdct Judge challenging the order of-diunioaal of
39/
eviction pouuouo and the dismissal oruo
up ingethcr by the I
dklniuing the said HRC So.
to 54 of 2002. when the -pending
mom the aiouiouoogo 6′ Rule 17
are have of
the court fled heinm the on
court oooo..o.oo along with the
men?-oonoosas, 535 b 542 to 544 and 545 to
of the no um 11:”:
” X – late Kutubuddin Rajeaab
that the petition Ichadub pnnlueao
mac no 229. 231 and 232 or me
at
tenements: part of=1’nvop’ertyNo. 8?5–ofMn’lmt
Road. Camp. Bclgmum. ‘rhea: revision peflflona uinevout of
teapect of only two tenement: wl.mh._I”= kt
further case of the and his
dependents am no. 75 and
that in the has him to the
abate of Viziifillill bmther nut: that
the died and
tjga.% respondents fibd ohjoetton_ -tattntent
than was no nuchttparliflnn and the fignd
filed in HRC No. 190 tutti 191 of 1979 and 251 of
tgsscametobctumiaaea.
3%
E
judgment at that we’ the pefiiimfi %« «hemévnij &% ‘i.i.:A. ‘
no. 13 to 15 which came AA ‘
filed by the gapimnnentid’ the
pcfltitmcra in not peuflonen’ have
failed to other with]: and
by bnfim: it. -Hence the
all then: peuum chnllenfing
of–learned counts] for both
Oauuhelolv hueammmed m crmrin
mama; in pmemiacs homing No.75. aelpm. By-virtue of
thea1mngen1emninthefnIuly.thepetltion-schedule
P°flfi9nm- AI 3 result. !°0PmId¢I}t9 are V.
the pmmileo. -Now the T
pbaded being g otal Iegistcmd.
1’hc:cfim:, Court below that
The-eanenam-nae-nu
exhaust. But the Court below have
A 2_§{:VbE!z oppuflnnity In addlwc evidence. by
document -by me-opening flue case. The
for hntcxiacnce. The mung. teeauled by an
below that nu:-.A should he mginlnmd in many
Soalnothcfindingthatthcreatevatinlionu
‘between pleadings and the proof
Whatever plcadcd by the party by
Thcrefam. III: has beoonm
August. 1985 -whereas P.\V. 1’ thai
wmngly typed as yen-
of the dew of m a mud *0
dinbelicvc In hot. death
extant diud on 215-3-
. But the come-
‘ ” fact thntearhet’ eviction
bmgcz r«ee;b9o & 191 of 1979 and 251 «$1983
10 year: back-on dflerunt-gonads
cause of action and will n_ot-agent: as
of the pcntlnnera” e consisted at 20
h there is no suitable aooonnnodatlnn aveueble
but to ebime the muted pmmiaem. e The ma: Gmnt.
its finding that the teopondantl nueueeeeuuepuaea
the awncmhip of the petition: Ho.-85′. Hence, -than
petitbns. Thcmibme. orders under. chaneage
be set aside.
in all these cam by the
peuuonm when in finds-out
i- mu-1~d [ bona6= A% -= and mm. the com
finding fiat Hiha an-ouu ht:
and ought to have been duly
« proceedings or the-onlar pinned by
m@%%*% cannot be heated at conclusive ptoof
L Anfdcmxmv .’}.aflon’ of proplicty rights. Thomson. -pe|:lhna’ no
team.- 1»obe dismissed.
£<
peruee. the point that arises for
27(2)m of the Act and the et.t.~t;i2mett
them to arlduoe and if an.
whether it came set any –
12. 547 of 2005 hnvc
been the ones’ of
atemteeet’ %%%% mac Non.23l at 232 of
trial court which has been
meets: Court in mac RP llon.4B- to so and
Admittedly, the said LM. have
‘ petitioners when the matter was reserved
The trial aeutt atemeeea’ the an
said applintitmnhantteentnuieoutby-the
Fllrtllenbylelyingonthedociainnl-reporbdh
/ lLR1996Kar553andlLR ar’22l5.theDiIuictCou:t
it holding that what the com
Judgment. the question of V _ f*t.)to-1
reaczwd for judglneny tho to do
anything oxoept to ‘l’he!I:fom the
Courts holawworc ttght.htdumwmg’ l.Aa.-andnhe
the I-!RCRl=”_V to of 2002. Home,
I-IRRP 54? cranes are liable to %
Non.-585 at 53512005 mod hy the
* _ petitions mac Noo.2a2 am 231
that which has bean continued in than 129 51
.’&,__ V¢«l-7 mpectlwly befinse the District Judge.
_ _ the trial Con-rt oootooaoo that in tho
No.75 wherein he and his toasty motnhet-o wet-o
L toototog. ton toto fiw& outhvhtother
of the name in her and thenzfmls.-. *
placed on xeomti by the
pleaded by them Whih
minim-I theory of gut
made by k in favour of
fin pending. man: than a
I
an N 0 I by I H .
dead had been utecuhd ‘m favour of
petitioner’ cannot make out n-new one
_ wl’§iel¥’§u not pleaded. Momma-r.1f|3c Oourh -below have
1_¢mmmenuyhe1ath.ttheaasaginaeeahmLnot%becnpuowd
Ex.P-’13-thegifldeed is-notadocumentmemlingput
Mohammadan Law. -0313! wilt of; Tit: o
admission, but once the nu so
not apply. Hence the noun»
on the said gift deed. it the on
Court that one ortho deed had and
prior to tho gut dooa. -It in
wronfly typed at 1-985
and itar of the gin–deed died only in
is othntuod to be true. the
or have filed the document: h their
documents pmduced when the mauar in
notinnphed tho trial Court to look
name atttlne some are not public document and can
§hcHgot upforthc purpose-oftho suit. So also. the pefitbnnn
1-‘nu-1 to examine the said Sarfimnina-t.to whom git £__,.,_
hm been made. Then-.foxe I do not find any _
find fault with the findings moo.-aeq
that mgard. 9; A
tlfi of tin:
yr-plupcliy, then: is no gm deed
is nowhiapesfi to occupy the
by the petitioners is
they mquirc the petflbn schedule-pleuisea
require the petition schedule pmuau far am’
‘A occupation, as such the initial bmdcn is on the
” theowncraafthc;nupc11ybearingNo.75andtheyhadno
11/
respondents have l ‘__
available in favour of-the pennant} by to
the cfibct that the
the @111 does not
the the
trial have utahuahna
ploparty hearing No.75 in
and that floor building having
for him family mahhm and ma
.’ R§;75 were mane house pmperly ,
No.62 at chutch Street, Camp ‘l’hmefuIe,
A *?. ‘_ below were right in holding requirement
ofthe landlowd in not banaflde and
16. Further. the applications
before the District Judge to 2
No.75 and am residing in been
rightly dismiued by that the
petitioners cause of action
which innfimtc hush evictim
37- – mm” mm:
do to intmixewith the connument
j I 1 aabym % ‘ H ‘ an %
are liable to be dismissed. Aoeonilngly.
_ , _ 7
Sci]-
‘°” % V Judge