Gujarat High Court High Court

Kirtikamal vs State on 22 October, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Kirtikamal vs State on 22 October, 2008
Author: Akil Kureshi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/432519/1997	 1/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4325 of 1997
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
 
 
=========================================================

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================

 

KIRTIKAMAL
BHUPENDRASINHJI VAGHELA - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
SHIRISH JOSHI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1 -
2. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 22/10/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

The
petitioner has challenged an order dated 21.6.1996 to the extent
same is adverse to her. Father of the petitioner had All India
License to hold three specified fire arms. Since he was old aged
person, he decided to transfer one such arm in favour of the present
petitioner. Request was partially granted by the State Government by
order dated 21.6.1996. Though license was transferred, it was made
valid only for State of Gujarat. It is this part that the petitioner
has challenged in this petition.

From
the record, it appears that the petitioner was professor in Hindi at
the relevant time. She may have required to carry fire arm or
possess one which she in due course may inherit from her father who
was an ex-ruler, but it is difficult to appreciate why she would
need to carry the same outside of State of Gujarat.

No
infirmity in the impugned order is therefore, found.

The
petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.

(Akil
Kureshi,J.)

(raghu)

   

Top