Gujarat High Court High Court

Kishanbhai vs Gujarat on 26 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Kishanbhai vs Gujarat on 26 August, 2010
Author: K.A.Puj,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/13643/2009	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 13643 of 2009
 

===================================
 

KISHANBHAI
CHHAGANBHAI - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

GUJARAT
URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD & 4 - Respondents
 

=================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR
KETAN D SHAH for Petitioner. 
RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1.  
MS
LILU K BHAYA for Respondent Nos.2, 4. 
MR KB PUJARA for Respondent
No. 3.  
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 5.
 
===================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 26/04/2010 
ORAL ORDER

Mr. Viral
Shah, learned advocate appearing for Mr. Ketan D. Shah for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received the copy of
the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 on
19.01.2010 though there is an endorsement of the Clerk of Mr. Ketan
D. Shah. However, he says that this is not the endorsement of his
Clerk. Ms. Lilu Bhaya, learned advocate appearing for the respondent
No.2 is directed to explain as to whom the copy of the said reply is
served. In any case, Mr. Shah wants to file rejoinder. Time is
granted. S.O. To 29.04.2010. To be placed in the 1st
Board.

It
is communicated that Ms. Bhaya has filed leave note for the entire
week. Matters relating to Electricity Act are fixed and hence, she
is not in a position to appear for the entire week. The Electricity
Company should make an alternative arrangement. The matter will not
be adjourned on the ground of leave note of the counsel when the
Institution is a party.

Sd/-

[K. A. PUJ, J.]

Savariya

   

Top