High Court Kerala High Court

Kooliyodan Sulaiman vs The State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2006

Kerala High Court
Kooliyodan Sulaiman vs The State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4051 of 2006()


1. KOOLIYODAN SULAIMAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

 Dated :17/07/2006

 O R D E R
                          J.M.JAMES, J.
                            --------------
                         B.A.4051/2006
                          ------------------
      DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2006


                            O R D E R

The petitioner is a licensee, for conducting

granite stone quarry, in the property of one Kodakkadan

Mohammed. However, he was found in possession of five

kilograms of sulphar. The petitioner submitted that as he

was licensed, he was conducting the quarrying, through

explosion of the granite. The prosecution submits that the

petitioner, though was permitted to quarrying, was not

legally authorised to possess such explosive substances.

Manjeri Police registered crime No.395/2006 under

Section 5 of Explosives Substances Act, 1908, and under

Section 9 (b)(1) of the Explosives Act, 1884. The counsel

submits that as the petitioner was possessing sulphar,

section 9(b)(1) of the Explosives Act alone will be

effective, and as the petitioner was not having any

materials for making any explosives substances, section 5

of the Explosives Substances Act cannot be resorted to.

B.A.4051/2006
2

Yet another contention of the counsel is that in such

circumstances, the offence alleged under the Explosives

act is triable by the Magistrate court and the petitioner is

hence entitled for bail. The application is filed, under

Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. After hearing both sides, I direct the petitioner

to surrender before the investigating officer of Manjeri

Police Station, on 21.7.2006 between 10.00 a.m and

11.00 a.m. The petitioner shall be interrogated by the

investigating officer and thereafter, be produced before

the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Manjeri, as per

the law. If the investigating officer requires the

petitioner for further interrogation, he may move an

application before the Court below for the custody of the

petitioner, which shall be heard by the learned

Magistrate and appropriate orders shall be passed

according to the law.

3. If the petitioner move an application for bail,

on production, the learned Magistrate shall also hear him

as well as the Prosecutor and pass orders on that

B.A.4051/2006
3

application. If the application for bail is filed, after

serving copy of the same to the APP, well in advance, the

same shall be heard and disposed of, on the same day

itself, considering the contentions of the petitioner.

The application is disposed of as above.

J.M.JAMES
JUDGE

mrcs