High Court Kerala High Court

Kopleri Hamza vs Kizhakkepallikkal Haseena on 6 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
Kopleri Hamza vs Kizhakkepallikkal Haseena on 6 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 413 of 2009()


1. KOPLERI HAMZA, S/O.KUNJU MOHAMMED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KIZHAKKEPALLIKKAL HASEENA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. JERISA, AGED 15 YEARS,

3. SIDIRA, AGED 13 YEARS, D/O.HASEENA.

4. MOHAMMED SANATH, AGED 11 YEARS,

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :06/02/2009

 O R D E R
                          M.N. KRISHNAN, J
                        -----------------------
                    CRL.M.C.No. 413 OF 2009
                  ---------------------------------
             Dated this the 6th day of February, 2009


                              O R D E R

This petition is filed to direct the Family Court, Malappuram

to allow the prayer in Annexure A5 petition to refer the petitioner

and respondents 1, 3 and 4 to the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation for

Bio Technology, Thiruvananthapuram for conducting DNA test. A

report was called from the Judge, Family Court Malappuram. The

learned Judge has submitted that the question of the application

for DNA test can be considered only when necessity arises and

when non access is proved which will displace the presumption

under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. So here one has

to find out whether there was an access or possibility of an

access and only on determination of the same and making sure

that the presumption under Section 112 may not be available,

the further question has to be probed into. I am not expressing

anything on the merits of the case but I make it clear that the

Family Court shall number and keep the application for sending

persons to DNA test and dispose of it as and when the evidence

Crl.M.C.No. 413/2009
-2-

with respect to the access is completed. The court has to satisfy

its judicial conscience before passing an order.

Crl. M.C. Disposed of accordingly.

M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE

vkm