IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIQ AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE O5?" DAY OF C3C'I'QBER', 2010 BEFORE THE HOBPBLE hm.JUSTICE ESREENIVAS-E M.F.A. NO. 1061 1/2065 (Mvc)%%&¥T%[ 1 5 _ gmwmg: KRISHNA EANGERA AGED ABGUT 26 Yam 810 CHANDU EABGERA A M RIG KAPWU HQUSE 'V mama 'VILLAGE AND mm', ». _' PRESENTLY rem!' V " j " Knsmm mag, 75, unum mxmc ARE I)I$'l'RI(3T * (BY am: PAVA2€5 cmmm.$mm_.H, ADV.) éfl 1.
-mt Bfi1sA<}}'iA_NDRA'BEE1E*ARNA namx
" A¢3:ED";fi.B'(':f£IT'5Q '(Ram
<3/Q EE.ER£;i'E%,"v
ago
I)3:3'IfRIc'1'
-THE msuamcn co 13m
.1′ j; _ OFFICE, I FLOGR,
551 301
QREP mm 13.11., 123.0 A’? UDUP1,
% commx cm. amm mm
P 3 mm: 1903 R ARI!
T % ‘< 09:9 snarrma vmm, mnaez, mum
= masmamms
HUPIGE TO RI I8 DI$PEN8EB WITH VIC 13'? 29.9.20 10)
Q?
22
MFA FILEB {H8 173(1) OF’ EV ACT, AGAINST’
JUI)GEB$HT AND AWARD DATED 18.10.2008 PASSED
Ham/acme on THE mm or pnmcmm, own. mmm {*.m.m~I.j'<,
& ADDYYIOHAL mar. UDUPI, PARTLY mmwme ,_
mrrrmn mm commnmmn Am: ssmmwc; Emm.15:»:mm:m. :
OF' COBKPEN3.&T'i{3N.
THE APPEAL comma or: mix _
THE COURT DELIVERED THE F’0LL0WIHG%’eV A’ . _ 2
This appeal E by the’ ‘ zgfilhanccmctxt of
mmpcnaation by
2. i and with the
commt of 2:15;; for the parti&, it
is taken up fmf V
. “” ‘bf wmmnienm, tha part:ie.s are
rcfe.rred referred to in the claim petition
‘ ‘The brief facts at the case:
. 9.3.2007, when the claimant was travelhng’ in a
mgiauaaion No. KA-19-B-7819 as a. conductor
Vimar Pulkeri Juxzctian, Karkala, a. lorry bearing @t1’at.1’9n
t?§-K
3
Na.KA-30-B-258′? came in a rash and negligent manner
and dashed wixmt the bus. As a reault, the claimant fell
down and suastained mjuries. I-Ience, he filed 3. <:.}£'sj1;r1
mtition before the MACT, Uciupi seeking %
ms.4,4o,5m/-. The Trihsunal awarded
comenaatioxx 0f Rs.5,w0/- with 4' 'V
5. as there is no diapute of
accident, negligence and liability_ the inf the
afiending vehicle, the ozvziy?’ for my
%
Whgthcr’ awarded by
the just remsonable er dam it
” ‘~ ¢f:.1{x.i::;a::1c<:A:'*.t1'4::.–.*'–..*::.!_–'«':r'-'""'
tkm learned counsel appearing fer
pfi 'perusing' the judment and award of the
12113 View that the compexmtiaon awarded
is not just and rcaaanabla, it is an tha
and htn.c:r: E is required. to be emhanceed.
fir
7. As per wound cartificaic: Ex.P-4, tin:
has suataimd simpk: ixzjuriee. The injuries v 2
the claimant are supported by area! evidence of
ezxaminad as pw-1. The claimant.
ducts): regarding nature of injzzrk-:5. .V ” ‘
3. Medical bills a;__ Ex,l3-#5. the
claimant has spent a sum medical
cxpemes. proper tea
award 3. glabal %%Rs’;1o;ooo/- as against
Rs.5,000,’-
9. ‘m allowed in part. Thc
by the Tribunal $5 modified to
thc.Ve:3 §té§i_t’ abavc. The claimant ‘m enfitled for
ef RI.5,€l00[- with interest at
‘”–?:§3vi>~.__’1’.*e.aAA..fi-c$:c1:; 3~thc: date of claim petificm till the date cf
% A x % “raa}:§.¥.sa1;.im1x.–‘
The Ixxsurancc Company is directeci to dcpcsit
iiha enhazmed wnipenwion amount togather with intexwt
8;:
within tvmmomhs firm the date ofreccipt eta copy afthis
judmcntand the same: :13 arclered to be released V
<31' the claimart immediately after the cwosit.
1 1. Na cram" aats scram.
BM