Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.


Madras High Court
Krishna Bhatta vs Lakshminaranappa on 28 August, 1891
Equivalent citations: (1892) 2 MLJ 13


JUDGMENT

1. We are of opinion that Section 12 of the Rent Recovery Act does not apply to this case. In the first place it is not shown that the plaintiff comes within the class of landholders defined by Section 3, and next it is impossible to suppose that in an Act for consolidating and improving the law for the recovery of rent, it could possibly be intended to repeal the ordinary law relating to contracts and enact that one contracting party could put an end to the contract whenever he chose and the other never. (See the remarks of Holloway J. at page 173 in the case reported at 6 M.H.C.R., 164, Ghockalinga Pillai v. Vythealinga Pundara Sunnady.)

2. The appeal is dismissed with costs.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.145 seconds.