High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Krishna Murari Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 1 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Krishna Murari Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 1 December, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CWJC No.1091 of 2007
            KRISHNA MURARI PRASAD AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS SON OF LATE
            KAMTA PRASAD, SEBAIT THAKUR RUKAMINI NATH JEE DEITY
            ASTHAPIT MANDIR SHERGHATY AT MOHALLA HATIA, P.O. & P.S.
            SHERGHATY, DISTRICT GAYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AMARUT,
            P.O. AMARUT P.S. DOHBI, DISTRICT GAYA.
                                    Versus
            1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
            2. BIHAR STATE BOARD OF RELIGIOUS TRUST, BIDYAPATI MARG,
               PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE BOARD OF
               RELIGIOUS TRUST, VIDYAPATI MARG, PATNA-800001.
            3. THE CAHIRMAN, BIHAR STATE OF RELIGIOUS TRUST, VIDYAPATI
               MARG, PATNA-800001.
            4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CUM EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               CUM TEMPORARY TRUSTEE OF SRI THAKUR RUKMINI NATH JEE
               TRUST BOARD, SHERGHATTY, DISTRICT GAYA.
            5. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH S.D.O. SHERGHATY, DISTT.
               GAYA.
                                          -----------

02. 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the Bihar State

Board of Religious Trust(hereinafter referred to as the Board) as also

the Administrator of the Board.

2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 2.12.2006,

Annexure-8 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track

Court-II, Gaya, whereunder learned Additional District Judge has

refused to stay the operation of order dated 6.12.2005 contained in

Annexures-4, 4/A to this application, whereunder the then Chairman

of the Board had declared the petitioner trust as public trust and

directed the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya to take

possession of the trust. Perusal of order dated 6.12.2005 does not

indicate that the then Chairman of the Board having perused the

endowment deed declared the petitioner trust to be a public trust.

3. Having heard counsel for the parties, I direct the present

Administrator of the Board to peruse the endowment deed as also
-2-

other relevant documents and record appropriate finding in the mater,

for which purpose 15.12.2010 is fixed as the date for hearing, on

which date the representative of the trust along with Sri Rudra Deo

Kumar Sinha, Advocate shall appear in the office of the trust at 3.30

p.m.

4. With the observation and direction aforesaid, the writ

application is disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J.)
Rajesh/