High Court Kerala High Court

Krishnamoorthy @ M.D.K.Babu vs The Station House Officer on 7 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
Krishnamoorthy @ M.D.K.Babu vs The Station House Officer on 7 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5356 of 2007()


1. KRISHNAMOORTHY @ M.D.K.BABU, S/O.MANI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :07/09/2007

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J.
                            ----------------------
                         B.A.No.5356 of 2007
                      ----------------------------------------
              Dated this the 7th day of September 2007


                                 O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is the husband

of the de facto complainant. He faces allegations inter alia under

Section 498A I.P.C. The crime has been registered on the basis of a

private complaint filed before the learned Magistrate and referred by

the learned Magistrate to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent

arrest. Marriage took place on 6/7/2006. There is some strain in the

matrimony. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

because of such strain in matrimony, the de facto complainant/wife is

raising fanciful and exaggerated allegations against the petitioner.

The petitioner does not deserve to endure the trauma of arrest and

incarceration in prison. Anticipatory bail may, in these circumstances,

be granted to the petitioner, prays the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the prayer

for anticipatory bail. I reckon that as an informed and reasonable

stand taken by the learned Public Prosecutor. Arrest and

incarceration of the petitioner in custody will mar all possibilities of a

B.A.No.5356/07 2

harmonious reconciliation of the spouses in the infant marriage,

appropriate conditions to facilitate a harmonious settlement of the

dispute can of course be imposed.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following directions

are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the petitioner.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 14/09/2007.

ii) He shall be released on regular bail on condition that he

executes a bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only)

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of

the learned Magistrate.

iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m and 3

p.m on 15/09/2007 and 16/09/2007 and thereafter on all Mondays

between 10 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months and

subsequently as and when directed by the investigating officer in

writing to do so.

(iv) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest

the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law, as if these

directions were not issued at all.

B.A.No.5356/07 3

(v) If he were arrested prior to 14/09/2007, he shall be

released from custody on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand only) without any sureties, undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 14/09/2007.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No.5356/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007