..1._
EN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE47.
mATaD TEES THE 315' ngy or JANUARY fiéégifajé-"
PRESERT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsTIcE?x.3RE§afiAfiTRAbVfaTw,-
Afifit
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE:§;N5SATYA§ARAY§¥A
M.r;A;mo,7§é3féa53(}%f)H°'V
C/w M.F.A;Mo,748§{2Gfi3 (KW)
IN MFA No.74e3k:ao3$
BETWEEN
1 KR£SH&Afi AGRGRAMURTHY"~w'
T 3/0. DR;K.WAGH0RAMURTHY
PH£s$NTL¥*RfAT.N0,"43?9,
DULCET STREET, SAJGSE
CALLIGQRNIA, cA*9513e,T
Vu,3.A;=REp BY 9A"HoLDER,
"gs.RAMANATaAN, IAs<RETD)
.fNo;,354, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
.3 3A9§$HITANAGAR
"BAM§ALGRE--~8O
."~f» 'fr' ... APPELLANT
{By.: azsfisfiwaakaswgmy RAMEAS )
=
TTj1_fmUNIRAJv c, ADULT,
WORKING AS DRIVER AT K.S.R.T.C.
BANGALGRE EEPOT
TANK BUND RGRD
S38 HNEGAR
BANGALORE – 550009
2 THE GERERAL MANAGER
K.S.R.T.C. B.T.S. DEPOT
TANK BUND ROAD
SRDRSHZVANAGAR
BAGNALDRE “G9
.§, REsP@§DE$Is E
(By Sri: P M NAWAZ, ADV. FOR R2
R1-NOTECE DISPENSED w;wH*§’
THIS MFA IS FILED’ uys 1?3(1a OF Mv ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT’_AND: AwAR§,guATEm:4.8.e3
PASSED IN MVC wo.265f95 foN,$3E FILE OF THE ABEL.
CIVIL JUDGE @sa,$DN;) &uCJM &,MAci, KOLAR, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CEAIM Pezxwlex FOR COMPENSATION ANQ
SEEKING ENHANCEMEHT GE CDMPENSATION.
IN MFA 748S?20o3&. – ”
BETWEEN u_” A}
1 _KR:sHNAN,AGHoRAMURTHY
.;s/6; DR.K: AGHCRAMURTHY
‘w PRESEEILY R/RT NO. $379,
A _DULCEY STREET, SAJOSE
V_”€ALLI@cgN:A, CA 95:36,
‘: sgs A, REP BY PA HOLDER,
,’s.RAMANATHAN, IAS(RET§)
* No; 35%, 4TH MAIN ROAB,
sAa3sH:VANAGAR
;L BANGALORE ~80
. A9PELLANT
ggyflw/s suxnaaaswamy RAMDAS )
1 MUNIRAJU C, ADULT,
WORKENG AS DRIVER AT K.S.R.T.C.
6:4?’/IA,
BANGALORE DEPOT
TANK SUNS ROAD
SUBHASHNAGAR
BANGALORE – 560009
2 THE GENERAL MANAGER
K.S.R.T.C. B.T.S. DEPOT
TANK BUND ROAD
SADASHIVANAGAR
BAGNALORE ~09
.:, REspcN§g§:s 7;”
(By Sri : P M NAWAZ FOR R2r_”
R1~NOTICE DISPENSE§ WI?fij,’
THIS MFA IS FILED’ UXS “1?3{1J OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT~ AND: AwAn§.jnATED:4.8.o3
?ASSED IN MVC wo.161/93,}oN_:HE sin: 0? $33 ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE_4sa;}nN;) ;_cJM.& Macy; KOLAR, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CEAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION ANS
SEEKING ENHANCEMEET 03 COMPENSATION.
THEs£,fipPE§$s Cémlfie 03 P03 ORDERS THIS DAY,
sazmnaaa RAOVJ}{‘DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘”= *,gg§§MENT
Both”,_appveal_sV’.ar\iégae cut of same accident in
resp£–§fi’:€L’.of ti”1eV._ civeat:?.n of Dr.L.}-‘agoramurthy and his
wife smtgmeénakshi.
.AV§;r–:§Ag0ramurthy and Smt.Meenaksh3′. were
tra*se’.el}.§;ngV.:’~’in a Fiat: Maruti car. The wife was
‘”.__ d;fijvi:€g__’Ehe ca from Bangalore to Tirupati. Wixen
hh’defkeye&.towardexbereonal expenses. Rs.SG,5GG/-
‘T*RS,ih,OOO/~ for funeral expenses. In all the
*, fietitiener is entitled to compensation of
..5..
sheet filed by the Police diselosee that’i:t”»..is
eeieiy on account of the negligence of bus et#%et_
the accident occurred. In View of thateethehtietuh-
material found in FER the jfifidingh of htrihuaaiK
that there is contributory neaieeehce eh the eattt
of driver of car is unteaahle. hHenCe.,ithgé§:te h
_ . e_ ._ : ‘m_W_
be held that the ,eecideeth*oeeurred’~sQle2y on
account of the neglifiehce gf baa efiiver.
4mm’-W °~»:”**”””
3. MFA…::ao.§3§_>;3¢:«9é3_: :1r§2’xz;:t.’1xi};»h;”2’65/1995)
This =,’eeee “h~§é}u§;fis:§ to death of
Dr.Ageramurthy._ The income tax returns shows the
total fiat _ineeee– aa””Rs.1,01,000f-p.a. The
deceased Qa$[ aged 7aheut 65 years. 59% to be
hY§ie.’¥eeu1dhueaure to the benefit of dependent.
Theyw tQtai:fi loss of dependency would be
‘v._Rs.4,5.4}.5oa/- {Re.SO,5002<;9). The petitioner is
Veeatitled to Rs.25fiOO/* fer loss of expectancy and
K
<£F/It
Accordingly, the appeals for enhan¢éméfifiLé:¢"_
allowed.
*. 2 ‘ }fii¢hgeF~_’q ;
,?f ;;R k1 LJ%ui§fi3
Nd/~