High Court Karnataka High Court

Krishnappa M vs State Of Karnataka on 9 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Krishnappa M vs State Of Karnataka on 9 November, 2010
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana
E.

V 'A  S/O. Late Shivaiingayya

A '  Rfétt Usukere,
" * _ Kasab¢3,A'I4io_t)li,

 --.,And fjfst"; '

V ' 'A R/ at Urukere,

I

IN "ma HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG" 
DATED THIS THE £3"-I DAY OF raoVEM;3§ii:: 20ij1o ' 1% ' 1'
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE s;'1*£.SA'fYA1~fA:2A&*.n;:\t2:;."'"~V 

WRIT PETI'I'ION Nos. 24887'-é{;§390 bk? 2009.: {('i'1~.;i'§l':*¥'2'/'V(:)

BETWEEN

Krishnappa. M _  A

Aged 58 Years    V 
S/o.Mudd3ranga:érya.    ,
Occ:Agri_Culfé[tiristV    " VV 
R/at    

KasabaV.HCc_hiAi, ' '

T:;¢I1'1i<!..1;:'V'7!?a11i'k.;  "

And D_isAt'~ _»  

O.C. Kfishnapp~a'-- 
Aged48 Years"  ° 
{S/Q. Chlklgarangayya
~ ' Agrictfits

 
 Naiarajfi
Aged 45 Years
'Dec: Agricuiturist
Kasaba Hobli,

Tumkur Taluk
And Dist

 



  '~ , v'i'hve"Revem_1e Inspector And Village

V " * 4_ Tumkur Taluk And Dist

K   Sziimvas @ Srinath

4. Ramakrishna
Aged 25 Years
S/0. Srirangappa
Occ: Agriculturist
R/at Urukere,
Kasaba Hobli,
TumkurTa1uk      =  
And Dist  ' Petit:1.Qn~ers. '' 3

{By M / S. J ayakurnar S Pati1Ass:Cieiates)V' V
AND V'

1. State Of Kamataka' '  i'      * _
E-Iiridu Religious Ar1g1_Cha1*itaE§le  'V
End0wmeL=._'ts,.__M. S;  V
Barlgalore       
Rep By«'{fs-.4_Seeretary__  

2. Thee.Asé1Vst"ari:';,Qor;1i:;issibI1e1j_ 
T'iiIHk1iF'~ _  i _  _
Ttitnkur Ta1u11<_And"~iDist ' '

3. The  VA ._
5"I'uri1kur   " V'
 -1:rup_rn.kiir Taiuk,___An:1 Dist

 Ac§':0_;u1tanti;T11mk:,1r
"-.iTurr1I§'u.r Taluk And Dist

5.  Raijgziéivmny Devasthana
Uragkere, Kasaba Hobli '

 Rep By Muzarai Officer

Aged 33 Years

8/ 0. Chikkarangayya
Oce: Agriculturist
R/at Urukere,

 



Kasaba. Hobli,
'I'umkur Taiuk
And Dist

Rajanna

Aged 55 Years
S/0. Siddappa
Occ: Agriculturist
R/ at Urukere,
Kasaba I-Iobli,
Tumkur Taiuk
Afld Dist

Gurumurthy

Aged 48 Years    'v
S/0. S1dd&1*a11'1€g0\}v(ia 

Occ: Ag;'fcuII_.:7u'rist.v  '

R/at [;}ruI§;efé';"    .

Kasaba.--,HC-bii,

T1.1;111~;:.uf ')'j7aluk;.; 2  . . 

Anjzd £_)ist* ;   

Nagagatna'  
Aged 2-3 Years A

AW/0. Namrajuv'
~ '5.()cCi': Hous"ev.IiVf_¢__& ;
A A V" R./at Umlkere,
" ~ .V 'Kavs'ab'a.._H'obIi,
 'F:.ufn1:ur 'faluk
  V

 Ra;3ga 1'a" xrnamrna

Age_r.i 33 Years

V " <»,_W/*0. Prakash. P
 '10cc:Agricu.1turist
"R/at Urukere,

Kasaba Hobli,
Tumkur Taiuk
Aad Dist

 



1!. Ramalingayya

Aged 55 Years

S / o. Chikkmimmayya

Ooe : Agricuiturist
R/at Urukere, V  «.   _ -V .
Kasaba Hobii,    ' '
Tumkur Taluk   '
And Dist

1"). Kempanna

Aged 48 Years

S/o. Rangappa 4_ %

Occ : Agriculturist ' '
R/at Um1ke_fe,._. = _  - 
Kasaba       
'I'uInkLu"" " '  .. -5'  v .

And   
15. S1.;E3ed1'1._AI3.i"tvj'._*v    . '  14- Laxmikanth
Aged'4o Yea:~sf'»_ i   ' 3/9 3-9339 iqarasimhaiah
S/o;.Léit.€ Narasiir-hai__af1 3395' 54 F3-'sou
 t _ .A .  cc: Archak
000    r/o Umkere,
{W  V U  ' Kasaba Hobli,
v~»'~'R/atUruke1'*CA,.._ .....  Ttzmkur Tq. & Diet.
_ é  ;{as;aba..Hob1:,
 V' * _ I ':.a.;r11~:ur_ Taluk
   Respondents

( By_Sri. .Ss_tt1–ye.narayaaa Singh, HCGP for R1~R5)

Theise Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227

of the Constitution Of India praying to quash the Notification
_ ‘ issued by respondent no.2 dated 03.08.2009 in
‘ SUM.D.V.S.C.R.15/09–1O produced at Annexnre ~ C and
~»v-grant an interim order to stay the operation and execution of

Annexure — C dated 3.8.09 issued by the respondent No.2 in
SUM. D.V.S.C.R 15/0940 eiecting the new executive
committee in respect of the respondent No.5 temple.

“””\

These Writ Petitions coming on for preliminaxyhearing

in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the foiiowing~:_ » .

ORQER

The petitioners herein are irnpugning'<._the –nVotification«

dated 03.08.2009 Vide Annexure ;'vC,0'-whereiri' the'

respondent herein has appo'inted a of' nine
members as Managing Cxorrinfittees A 'Ranganatha
Swamy Temple, Urukere, 0 Taluk who

are respondent nos-..6 Petition.

2. appoi:’.1tIne’:it’ . is , made by the third

respondent by infiolting provisions of Section 25 of the

Karnataka Hairidnt and Charitable Endowment Act,

, p_ 19:97′,{hereinafterreferred to as ‘Act’ for short).

the said Act is under challenge in a

Cfiroeeediriéppeiiding before the Apex Court, wherein by virtue

of order passed by the Apex Court in Civil

00 it ‘ Application No.5924/ 2008 passed on 31.07.2009 Section 25

Act is not in force.

I

“‘”\

JJ

6. On. these observations, the Writ Petition is

sd/:i’ %j[ §