IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1077 of 2009()
1. KRISHNAVENI, W/O.SIVASUBRAMANYA
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
Dated :26/03/2009
O R D E R
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Crl.R.P. No. 1077 of 2009
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this the 26th day of March, 2009
O R D E R
Petitioner who claims to be the owner of a tractor bearing
registration No.TN 41/R-2989 and a trailer bearing registration
No. TN 41/S-1326 involved in O.R. No.17/2008 of Kollengode
Forest Range Office registered under Section 27(1)(e)(iii) and
(iv) and 52 (1) of the Kerala Forest Act, 1951 challenges the
order dated 27-1-2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate of the
First Class, Chittur dismissing her application filed under
section 53 of the Kerala Forest Act for interim custody of the
vehicles.
2. The vehicles have already been produced before the
Authorized Officer for confiscation proceedings under Section
61A of the Kerala Forest Act. If that be so, by virtue of Section
53 of the said Act it is the officer concerned who can grant
interim custody of the vehicles (Vide John V. D.F.O., Kottayam
(1996(2) KLT 984) and the order dated 22-1-2008 in Crl.M.C.
No.42/2008). The learned Magistrate was, therefore, justified in
dismissing the application.
3. The revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed without
Crl.R.P. 1077/2009 -2-
prejudice the right of the petitioner to move the officer
concerned under Section 53 of the Act.
V. RAMKUMAR,
JUDGE.
mn.