High Court Kerala High Court

Krishnprasad vs State Of Kerala on 22 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Krishnprasad vs State Of Kerala on 22 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7304 of 2009()


1. KRISHNPRASAD, MANAGER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SHO,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :22/12/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                      ---------------------------
                      B.A. No. 7304 of 2009
                  ------------------------------------
            Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2009


                             O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused

in Crime No.111/2009 of Kasaragod Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 17 and 18-A-6(A) of the Kerala Money Lenders Act.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

14.12.2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel

for the petitioner and the learned Public

Prosecutor, I am of the view that before

disposing of the Bail Application, an

opportunity should be given to the petitioner

to appear before the investigating officer.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating

officer at 9 A.M. on 17th and 18th December,

2009. The petitioner shall produce a copy of

the order before the investigating officer.

B.A. No. 7304 of 2009 2

Post on 22.12.2009.

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioner will not be

arrested until further orders in connection

with Crime No.111/2009 of Kasaragod

Police Station.

Hand over copy to both sides.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor that the

petitioner has complied with the direction contained in the

order dated 14.12.2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I

am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the

petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police

station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.

15,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

A) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B.A. No. 7304 of 2009 3

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on
bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln