IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Miscellaneous No.12263 of 2009 &
Civil Writ Petition No.6648 of 2008
Date of Decision: August 24, 2009
Kuldip Rai & Others
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate, for the
applicant-petitioners.
Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate
General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
C.M. No.12263 of 2009
The application has been filed with a
prayer to allow the petition in view of judgment
dated 24.3.2009 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ
Petition No.4608 of 2009 titled `Surkhraj Kaur vs. State of Punjab &
Others’ in which reliance has been placed on judgment
dated 21.7.2008 rendered by Division Bench of this
Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15554 of 2007.
The application is allowed.
On the asking of learned counsel for
the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for
CWP No.6648 of 2009 [2]
hearing today itself.
C.W.P. No.6648 of 2009
This civil writ petition has been
filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of
India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature
of certiorari, quashing Order dated 31.10.2006
(Annexure P-3) to the extent it provides a
prospective cut off date in its implementation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
states that the matter is squarely covered by
judgment dated 24.3.2009 rendered by this Court in
Civil Writ Petition No.4608 of 2009 titled `Surkhraj Kaur vs. State of
Punjab & Others’.
Learned counsel for the respondents
has not been able to dispute the fact that the
matter is covered by the decision rendered in
Sukhraj Kaur’s case (supra).
In view of the above, this petition is
decided in terms of judgment dated 24.3.2009
rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.4608 of 2009
titled `Surkhraj Kaur vs. State of Punjab & Others’.
(AJAI LAMBA)
August 24, 2009 JUDGE
avin
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?