High Court Karnataka High Court

Kum Taramathi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By … on 16 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Kum Taramathi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By … on 16 October, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy


‘. A!>!:.iI.»’§«:

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 1673 DAY 01? oc7r0B3::9.§o (:§3i’%%’% ~

BEFORE;

THE HONBLE MR.JUS’FICE:’»RAIv£’ T:«é’o:a;;A;N.’1§’E§j:f>’¥_

CRL.R.P.N§_;_g93zég9* . ,3; V
BETWEEN: %’ %

Kt1m.Taraxnathi,

Aged abo1;t:t ‘
:1)/o; S’ub’ha§ ” >
R/0: Ivianumsagar, * ‘V

Ramdmfg ‘faiuk, ‘ Peiitioner

(By Sri R§v*i_VL.Vaidyé’;..Adi§bcatc (Absent) )

‘ The. VAStaE-.:?€>f__Kaxnataka,

‘ __T.¥zep.iese::tes1_is;:y Katakol 19.8.,

H =_ Ramduxg Taluk, Belgaum District.

..r}3~ ”

2. Fakirappa Hagcd,
about 50 years,

Kafiwa,
‘Aged about 46 years,
W/0 Hamnant Haged,

4. Ramakrishna Hanmaxlt Haged,

Aged about 24 years,

All arr: R/0: Hanamsagar,
Ramdurg Taiuk, Belgaum Ifiistrict. Rcsgondcnts

§% 5
f;”‘\

This pctifion is fibd under Section 397 r./w.
401 of Cr.P.C. praying to ca?) for record of C.C.D¥o.2%§8,I_’2€}V()6
on the file of JMFC, Ramdurg and set–a.*aidc “-_ti1c

judgment/ozder of acquittal passed dated 1£.4.2()’0′.?
by the JMFC, Ramdurg in Cl.C.No.248/2006 atgi 4_
accused in the said. C.C.No.248/2006 on of_;JMFC’,’ ”

Ramduzrg.

This petition co111n3g’ on for

made the following: V
onnbzm, Q
Though this petitiox} was fi3,efi registry

had notafied” omce objcct’i<$-ais days delay in

filing ._m\Afi§is.:n,::Vvv–wh¢n not complied was posted
before and 24.9.2008, on which

dategi time fias» aééféfidfiei for compliance.

' " _§c:f;ifion is listed today for orders on account of

of officc objections. Theme is no

mpzf-zscixtafibn for the petitioner nor omce cbjections

x V' V. With. Rcvisicn petition is accordingly rejected.

safs
311633

Ets""