Kumar Kartikeya vs Smt. Sweta @ Rubi & Anr on 20 June, 2011

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                      MA No.501 of 2009
                                    KUMAR KARTIKEYA
                                            Versus
                                SMT. SWETA @ RUBI & ANR
                                          -----------

13 20-06-2011 Considering the office note that neither the

registered cover nor the A/D card have been received

back and sufficient time has elapsed, service of notice

upon respondent no.2 is accepted as valid.

It appears from the record that after service of

notice respondent no.1, Smt. Sweta @ Ruby has filed

I.A. no. 1836/2011 saying that she has filed the same in

person without engaging any counsel.

In that view of the matter, let name of Smt.

Sweta @ Ruby appear in the column for counsel for the

respondent henceforth.

(Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)

(Vijayendra Nath, J.)
BKS/-