High Court Kerala High Court

Kumaran vs Santhoshkumar.M.G. on 26 May, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kumaran vs Santhoshkumar.M.G. on 26 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 2727 of 2009()


1. KUMARAN,S/O.RAVEENDRAN,KALAVAMPARA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SANTHOSHKUMAR.M.G.,S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHAMDHAR.N.A,NADAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,

3. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.BALAMURALEEDHARAN (PARAVUR)

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :26/05/2010

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                 ...........................................
                  M.A.C.A.NO.2727 OF 2009
                 .............................................
            Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010.

                        J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the

Claims Tribunal, Perumbavoor in OP(MV)No.748/2006. The

claimant is alleged to have sustained injuries in a road

accident while a bicycle driven by him was hit on the back

side of a Scorpio car. He had sustained fractures and

was admitted in a hospital. But the court below dismissed

the application on the ground that entire materials are not

placed before the court to appreciate the matter. It

appears that when he was admitted in the hospital, it was

represented that the accident took place while the said

person was travelling in a bike.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant showed me a

copy of the FIR which is registered on the basis of a private

complaint referred under Section 156(3) of the Criminal

Procedure Code. There the mention is of a bicycle.

Unfortunately, it is a case where the claimant did not

produce those documents nor did tender any evidence when

: 2 :
M.A.C.A.NO.2727 OF 2009

there is a dispute regarding the cause of injury. The

learned counsel would submit that if an opportunity is given,

he shall produce the necessary documents and adduce

evidence. I am inclined to grant an opportunity.

3. Therefore, the award under challenge is set aside

and the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal with liberty

to all concerned to produce documentary as well as oral

evidence in support of their respective contentions and then

dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Parties are

directed to appear before the Tribunal on 03.07.2010.

Disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

cl

: 3 :
M.A.C.A.NO.2727 OF 2009