High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Singh vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 23 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Singh vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 23 September, 2011
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     CR. REV. No.242 of 2010
                   Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Singh son of Rajindar
                  Singh, resident of village- Parwalpur, Police
                  Station- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda.
                                                        ... petitioner.
                                                   Versus
                   1. State Of Bihar
                   2. Parshuram Sharma son of Shri Vishwachand
                      Sharma, resident of village- Rukhai, Police
                      Station- Chandi, District- Nalanda.
                                                .. opposite Parties.
                                              -----------

2. 23.09.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred

this revision application against the order

dated 15.12.2009 passed by the learned Juvenile

Justice Board, Nalanda at Biharsharif in J. J.

B. No. 13 of 2008 arising out of Parwalpur P.

S. Case No. 331 of 2007 by which the leaned

Juvenile Justice Board has found sufficient

material for amending the charge for the

offence punishable under Section 304 B I.P.C.

and the petitioner has been directed to be

present on the next date for explaining

accusation.

                               Heard        Mr.     Zeyaul       Hoda,      learned

                  counsel      for    the   petitioner         and   Dr.   Rabindra

Kuamr, learned A.P.P. for the State.

It appears from the impugned order

that a petition dated 13.10.2009 was filed on

behalf of the prosecution stating inter alia

that there is material for framing of charge
2

under Section 304 B I.P.C. and the accused-

petitioner has also filed his reply dated

6.11.2009. After hearing both the parties,

learned Juvenile Justice Board has found that

there is material for framing of charge under

Section 304 B I.P.C.. Charge can be altered at

any time.

                      Considering               the         facts          and

          circumstances,       I    do    not    find    any      ground   to

          interfere     with        the    impugned         order.     This

          petition is dismissed.


Kanchan                            (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)