High Court Kerala High Court

Kunjiaysumma vs The Government Of Kerala on 25 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Kunjiaysumma vs The Government Of Kerala on 25 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22265 of 2008(A)


1. KUNJIAYSUMMA, W/O A.T. SAID MOHAMMED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. GURUVAYOOR MUNICIPALITY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KRISHNAKUMAR MANGOT

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :25/08/2008

 O R D E R
                        ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
               = =W.P.(C) = = = = = = = = = = = =
                           No. 22265 OF 2008 A
                    = = =


               Dated this the 25th day of August 2008


                           J U D G M E N T

Heard both sides.

2. Petitioner submitted an application to the respondent

Municipality for a building permit. That was rejected by Ext. P3 on

the ground of the pendency of a Town Planning Scheme. She

moved the 1st respondent by Ext. P4 and that resulted in Ext. P5(b)

order dated 31.3.2005 thereby the Government allowed her

application exempting the construction from the zonal requirements

of the Town Planning Scheme.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner made necessary applications to

the Municipality and finally she received Ext. P7 from the

Municipality, rejecting the request in view of Ext. P8. In Ext. P8

Govt. Order, the Government have directed rejection of the

petitioner’s application in view of the judgment of this Court

rendered on 7.11.2005.

W.P.(C) No. 22265 OF 2008
-2-

4. As already noticed, exemption was granted by Ext. P5(b)

dated 31.3.2005 and in view of that, the rejection relying on a

subsequent development cannot be sustained.

5. In view of this, Exts. P7 and P8 will stand quashed and the

Municipality shall consider the application made by the petitioner in

pursuance to Ext. P5(b) and pass fresh orders. This shall be done as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production

of a copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
jan/-