IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 16066 of 2007(K)
1. KUNJU MOHAMED SOOFI,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SECRETARY, IRINJALAKUDA CO-OPERATIVE
... Respondent
2. THE SALE OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA
3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE
For Petitioner :SRI.K.S.RAJESH
For Respondent :SRI.V.G.ARUN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.K.CHANDRASEKHARADAS(RETD. JUDGE)
SHRI P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY (RETD.DIST.JUDGE
Dated :25/03/2010
O R D E R
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS
(RETD. JUDGE)
AND
SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) NO.16066 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010
A W A R D
The secretary of Irinjalakkuda Co-operative Agricultural and
Rural Development Bank Limited has produced a letter dated
24.03.2010 stating that the petitioner has remitted entire amount
due to the Bank on 08.10.2007 and the related documents has been
returned to the petitioner on 28.11.2007. The letter of the
Secretary is taken on record and the Writ Petition is closed as
settled.
Sd/-
T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS
(RETD. JUDGE)
Sd/-
P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
ss/.
//True copy//
P.A to Judge
? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
+WP(C).No. 5654 of 2009(B)
#1. K.P. SEBASTIAN, S/O. LATE PATHROSE,
... Petitioner
2. AMBIKA DINESAN, W/O. DINESAN,
3. SONA PAUL W/O. PAUL PAUL, ,
4. ROSILV THOMAS, W/O. LATE THOMAS,
5. SEBASTIAN P.G., S/O. LATE
Vs
$1. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN.
... Respondent
2. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER,
3. THE ENVIRONEMENTAL ENGINEER,
4. GENERAL MANAGER, DESAI HOMES,
5. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, DESAI HOMES
! For Petitioner :SRI.A.X.VARGHESE
^ For Respondent :SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
*Coram
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.K.CHANDRASEKHARADAS(RETD. JUDGE)
SHRI P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY (RETD.DIST.JUDGE
% Dated :25/03/2010
: O R D E R
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS
(RETD. JUDGE)
AND
SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
W.P.(C) NO.5654 OF 2009
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010
A W A R D
Petitioners 4 and 5 and their counsel are present. They
have reported that the dispute involving in the Writ Petition has
been settled. The terms of settlement has been incorporated in a
memo signed by both parties and their counsel. This memo has
been taken on record and form part of the award. As per the
award an amount of Rs.55,000/-(Rupees Fifty five thousand only)
each to the Writ Petitioners is paid by demand draft, and such
five demand drafts have been handed over to the parties in our
presence and they have accepted.
An award is passed in the above terms.
Sd/-
T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS
(RETD. JUDGE)
Sd/-
P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
ss/.
//True copy//
P.A to Judge