High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Labhar Rai &Amp; Ors vs Ram Deo Rai &Amp; Ors on 6 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Labhar Rai &Amp; Ors vs Ram Deo Rai &Amp; Ors on 6 December, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                FA No.612 of 1973

                                      LABHAR RAI & ORS
                                            Versus
                                     RAM DEO RAI & ORS
                                          -----------

59. 06.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellants on

Interlocutory Application No. 4388 of 2007.

This application was filed by the appellants on

31st July 2007. From perusal of the record, it appears that

in spite of time granted to the respondents, no counter

affidavit is filed disputing the fact of issuance of notification

under Section 3 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and

Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956.

This first appeal has been filed against the

judgment and decree dated 19.9.1973 passed by Sri S.L.

Nandkeolvar Subordinate Judge, Hazipur in Title Suit No.

56 of 1969 decreeing the plaintiffs-respondents’ suit for

declaration of title.

This interlocutory application has been filed by

the appellants under Section 4 clause (c) of the Bihar

Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation

Act, 1956 for abating this appeal on the ground that

notification under Section 3 of the said Act has been issued

in the year 1975 during the pendency of this appeal.

In the case of Mst. Bibi Rahmani Khatoon and

others Harkoo Gope and others AIR 1981 SC 1450

the Hon’ble Supreme Court at paragraph 12 has held as
2

follows :

“12. Accordingly, both on principle and
precedent it is crystal clear that where a
notification is issued bringing the land
involved in a dispute in the civil
proceeding under a scheme of
consolidation, the proceedings pending in
the civil court either in the trial court,
appeal or revision, shall abate as a
consequence ensuing upon the issue of a
notification and the effect of abatement
would be that the civil proceeding as a
whole would come to a naught. Therefore,
the order of the High Court impugned in
this appeal is legal and valid so far as it
not only directed abatement of the appeal
pending before the High Court but also
abating the judgments and decrees of the
trial court and the first appellate court
because the entire civil proceeding came
to naught.”

In view of the above facts and circumstances of

this case, this first appeal as well as judgment and decree

impugned is abated under Section 4(c) of the Bihar

Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation

Act, 1956.

S.S.                                            (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)