IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23030 of 2011
Lakshaman Chaudhary & Anr.
Versus
The State Of Bihar
----------------------------------
02. 08.11.2011 As per Order impugned, the operative
portion suggests summoning of petitioner under
section 323, 364/34 of the IPC, while the informant,
who has appeared in this case, has submitted that it
happens to be a mistake committed at the level of
issuance of certified copy, as the Order speaks 323,
304/34 of the IPC and to support the same, shown
the photocopy of certified copy of the Order
impugned. As such, the learned counsel for the
informant is directed to file counter affidavit on this
score. The State is also directed to file counter
affidavit and for that four weeks’ time is granted.
Meanwhile, petitioner should supply a copy of the
petition. Till filing of the counter affidavit, further
proceeding before the learned lower Court in
connection with Semra P. S. Case No. 13 of 2010
shall remain stayed.
Put up after four weeks, retaining its
position.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
SKM