WP No.64972 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2099 % BEFORE Q V' THE HON'BLE MR.JUs'rIcE AJIT ' WRIT PETITION No.64972']'20<)9 BETWEEN: A i % H? Lakshman, S /0 Maruti Ambi;*ve.D.V"'*~. Age: 42 years, Occ: Ex~serviCe_:fi'a,_n,*.._V R/0 Pachhapur, Tq: }?eIL~1;ker'iV, " 1' H " Dist: Belgaum. - " ...1=ETIT10NER (By Sri. B.V.SQ:r1a_pur;,"AdvDpéfte):'e.._! AND; 1 . G0vea=nmeVnt Df" " < by its Se_C3'e»ta1'V, Horifge Department, New De1Hi.._ ' ~ * 2. V'Dire"et0f%' €3e1'1.era"E"," ' , "Bor--:1erCS~eCurity Force, ' v..DB10c.k"V1\?0.1'Q,~'C--4O complex, Lodi §<oad.,3=New Deihi. 3. Ci0:r1v"i1§;a.°vr'1c¥a.nt, V' .. D84, Battalion ESE' _ Road, Jaisalmer, "Raj asthan. ...RESF'OND}3N'I'S fay Sri. Gangadhar.S.H0sa}«:eri, Adv. for R1 to R3) WP No.64972 of 2009 This petition is filed under Articles 226 and .227' of the Constitution of India praying to direct", the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in his j0«b"~xiv"i.th--_a11
facilities or given him pension from the-.’_jdate _”of
acceptance of his resignation. ” ‘
This petition coming on theu’
Court made the following: ‘ hi i’ A
ORDER’
Even though this matt.e’r~..pis listed With’
consent, it is taken up for finai *d._i’spos_a1.
2. Petitioner joined;’the’-servi_ce’sii_’of ‘respondent as a
constables’i1i.iV7»thei1V’§Borde.r Seciirity Force. He served the
Border’SecurityVgF’o:’ce’–~Li.n’tii” his resignation was accepted.
The_p.etitioine.r gave representation to respondent No.3
a”-to'”‘sari’c’tio’n_pensionary benefits. The grievance of the
ii’–petitiioniewru i’1sfthvose terminal benefits have not been given
to ,I’ence another re resentation is iven on
.. P E
22,_.12..2–CiO6, a copy of which is produced at An.neXure–D.
“The*i”grievance is that the said representation is not
“considered.
perrni-tted in the Registry within four weeks.
WP N064972 of 2009′
3. When the matter is taken up, Mr.Ganga_c_i_har.S.
Hosakeri, learned counsel appearing for the respotidents
submits that they would Consider the reprleéent;:1ti’o11:’h’_”ofl’~.”
the petitioner for granting terminai”benef§_<ts b
with law. Hence the foilowing order '~ . «. ll
o R
Responderttjfj lVc«-_._2 V eortsider the
representation at dated
22. .7. ‘within c;rt’o.tOu«ter*l”.Zt’n1_i’t six months
from the” rec__éz7pt order. The said
consict’e:jt”ztiE3_:rj; ffl-Otecliordance with law.
It is covz1fine_otAVo%:!_u.V_to.Ahis_ltern:.in§al benefits.
Petit’2’o_4nhl 3vtdf1dS’dis;§osed of accordingiy.
ll”‘M36-éLn’gad’Vt;.ar.S.Hoelakeri, learned counsel, is
i
Sd/ii.
Iudqe
«UK
‘ Iffrix;-*=?*V