High Court Karnataka High Court

Lakshmi Alias Lakshmamma vs Basavaraja S/O Kannappa on 13 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Lakshmi Alias Lakshmamma vs Basavaraja S/O Kannappa on 13 March, 2009
Author: V.Gopalagowda & N.Ananda
 2. samisaa S/O LRTE NARAYANA
 'SHE'¥TIG9g.R;AIvi-- A. "
 Aezm A3003' QGYEARS
':2/0 sEvEBmA::;Ez2;::,« YEDEHALLI

 3. saaargraéam S/O LATE NARAYANA
~~ ..  ~.__s;z4ET'rxGA:aAM

 * AQEBLMQUT 22 YEARS

'  Iago, SEEEBINAKERE, YEDEHALLI

 _ *m:m*HAHALL1 TALUK

   S.H11'1vfOGA DISTRICT

A 1' '*4. 'SRIDEVI W/O MRUTHYUNJAYA
"  "AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT    H
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY QF"'MARc:5H,    
PRESENT   :" ' ' '  
THE HC)N'BLE MR.JUsTi»C:éfi: v.»G<3 F¥A1.A   
THE HOWBLE .:;§§:'§'I1:a;.I§;2s.:s_I_DA
V Wafl. e1s;é¥7-éjszfiobfi W    
BETWEEN;   --. = . % 

1.

LAKsHM£__ALi2=e..s” 1,A.:g:_sVHMAzy1MA -. V
W/O LATE NA1eA&*ANA i$HE’I’*;1GAR _
AGED ABOUT’ 52 *r;st,z~_;2{s,% ‘ — .
re/<3 sEEB1_Noz;E'12E §~*:3e;'1*'*
YEEDEJHRLLI, ..THIRTHAHALLI 'i1¢;LUK
SHIMOGA DIS'§TRIC.'I' -_ A

*r§:s;;2*mAH-At:,I_ mafia
SHIi'.rIO':3A nxsmzrztr

OCC: AGRICULTURIST

RIO BANAVASI, SIRS! TALUK

N.K. DISTRICT .. APPELLANTS
(By Sn". L} PANDURANGA NAYAK, ADVOCATE}

AND

1. BASAVARAJA S] O KANNAPPA

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

DRIVER OF’ THE LORRY BEARINGT. ..
R’EGN.NO.KA 145/1655, R/O
THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, FDI 1.2 / 59/9 3-97
VALID UPTO 28-2-2000

2. H UPENDRA KUMAR
s/0 KRISHNA GANIGA

MAJOR, 1:2/o SEEBENAKERE _ , ~ V
THIRTHAHALLI, owzeme OF”I”£~i’E..LORR”f_
BEARING £eEG.NQ.~KA’:4/1:555 ~

3. THE ORIENfi’AL_§NSfi’RANG£3._CC>_ ‘

POST BOX NO. 1_o7.., \;?INAYAKA”CQMPLEX

GARDEN mag, ‘:1_HINiQ.GA

901.10? N’O.1998,*I3%104;I.4 _ .

VALI3 UPTO 1.14-1.0’–9s»-_,AA = ‘ – Rgspoumzms

(By Sri. vARAx3ARAJ”:2 H.§.’v5 L;t2A1§ FOR R1:
sm’.c.sHANxA~::e REDDY s.»me~.-123: R2 SERVED)

§;iii’A,—%:}*1LvE::> if/s ——– “I73(1§ OF Max ACT AGAINST THE

J§:a.c:}MEN?ar§1>.._AwARD DA’}’EIZ):29/01/2005 PASSED {N MVC
‘NO;34R§c(3MPENsA’§’IoN AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT

ow CQMPENSATION.

This-V__A’1’appcal coming on for admission this ciay,

” “E§.NA!€QA, JC, delivered the following:

_ compagiy shall tfi}: same within four Weeks from the

sar-

7. Thcmfom, We award a sum of ; u
{Rs.2,{)0O x 12 x 11) tow:-Kris loss ofdépenq¢;§cy: V
Rs.40,000/ – under convcnfional
entitled to total compensation /E ‘

8. In View of the abmfc, WeVAi.iJHov§’ing:-..vvV§

The appcafg award is
modified. awarded by the
Tribunal The enhanced
compcnéafion’ “at 6% per annum from the

date. of realisation. The insurance

Judge
Sd/-.

fudge