High Court Kerala High Court

Lakshmi Amma vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Lakshmi Amma vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 258 of 2008()


1. LAKSHMI AMMA, W/O LATE BALASUBRAMANIAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :17/01/2008

 O R D E R
                              R.BASANT, J
                       ------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.258 of 2008
                      -------------------------------------
              Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008

                                   ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner faces allegations

of matrimonial cruelty of the culpable variety punishable under

Section 498 I.P.C. Crime has been registered on the basis of a

private complaint filed by the defacto complainant before the

learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate referred the same to

the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Investigation is in

progress. The petitioner, who is the 2nd accused and mother in

law of the defacto complainant apprehends imminent arrest.

2. The marriage had taken place on 13.09.2006. The

spouses are not blessed with any children. Cognizance has been

taken on a private complaint referred to the police.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I

am satisfied that the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail.

In coming to this conclusion, I take note of the fact that

admittedly the victim had not suffered any external physical

injuries. I take note of the reality that arrest and incarceration of

the petitioner is likely to close the doors of all possibilities of

B.A.No.258 of 2008 2

harmonious settlement of the matrimonial disputes. Appropriate

conditions can of course be imposed in the interests of a fair,

efficient and expeditious investigation.

4. In the result, the Bail Application is, allowed. The

following directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

i) The petitioner shall appear before the learned

Magistrate at 11 a.m on 24.01.2008. She shall be enlarged on

regular bail on her executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the

like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate;

ii) The petitioner shall make herself available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and

3 p.m on 25.01.08 and 28.01.08. During that period, the

Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioner in custody and take all necessary for the proper

conduct of the investigation. Thereafter the petitioner shall make

herself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer

between 10 a.m and 12 noon on all Mondays for a period of one

month and subsequently the petitioner shall make herself

available for interrogation as and when directed by the

Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

B.A.No.258 of 2008 3

iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioner and deal with her in accordance with law as if

those directions were not issued at all;

iv) If the petitioner were arrested prior to her surrender on

24.01.2008 as directed in clause (1) above, she shall be released

from custody on her executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five thousand only) without any sureties undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 24.01.2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-