Lakshmi Murthy W/O A G Krishna … vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 25 August, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 25:11 my OF AUGUST, 20E1aEi%*E<%,ETE ,

BEFORE

THE H01\pgLE MR. IUSTICE  NAQAMOHAN  

W.P.NO.16752V?20--Q6(LA'~1g_A_Qm     E

 

BETWEEN:

LAKSHMIMURTHY _,  
W/O A.G.KRISHNA   V
A/A:50YEARS_        
R/ATNo.8,  "    
V.V.MoHALLA,_"MYS©_RE;--..j;--.._    _  ' '

     «-- ' V ..PETITIONER

(BySri:P»1Li?A'fIL§'$54}Di7.3»_"_"=--.,"  E

 E, fs...,EisT&fE C§F«I:ARNATAKA

"  'R£r§ja..;'I'5"sECi3~'aTARY TO
-- A ' THE DEPAIKFMENT OF REVENUE
f\rI1:)1¥:A_r§A'soUD1~:A, BANGALORE.

 ,2. séL,LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

'  KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA

"  BEVELOPMENT BOARD, 488 B,

14?" CROSS, PEENYA II PHASE,
BANGALORE - 560 058.

5"'-

JV



?\J

3. KARNATAKA HVDUSTREAL AREA,
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, M;/3, 13" FLOOR,
RASHTROTHAM PARISHAD BUILDING,
NRIPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-

(By Sri K.S.MALLIK.AR}UNAlAH, GP FOR R1 "
Sri K.KR1SIfi\IA, Ami, FOR 323) " 

THIS WRIT PETITION IS°=F_ILED U'/A A226 3:: 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF   TO "QUASH THE
PRELIMINARY NoT1F1cA'1ToN_ RUBLISTTEB  ON DT.07.i2.20OS
ISSUED BY THE R2 & R3 VIBE AND ETC.

This petiiti'cynL:VI'co11ii,'ngg  for:he.'ari.n.gf this day, the court
made the following "   V"  T = ' »

t__Vf'w.-foRD£R* TTTT
Inith_ié writ-peit*iti'oni' "'ch_e'13etitioner has prayed for a writ in

the nature of (:'e1.r,t_iorari: to quash the preliminary notification

   _as per Annexure--E and the final notification

datedvi31.8.2§i}{}6e1'as per Annexute-F in so far as it relates to site

iq__No.3 ianti";.4,v situated at Mogarahalli village, Belagola Hobli,

   under Hosahalli Gram Panchayath, Srirangapatna Taiuk,

    District.

K'
r--5

J



2. Petitioner contends that she purchased t.h'e.i:'stnre--F   Far 

relates to the site in question is  be  
For the reasons stated:iab.os?e_,v   order:
1)  

 0   dated 31.8.2006 as per
8 ii is 'hereby quashed.

 iii):   niatterivis remanded to the second respondent -

Acquisition Officer for fresh disposal in
0 “V ‘accordance with law.

Petitioner is not entitled for any ftlrther notice from

the second respondent.

:~/’

J’.

V) Petitioner shall appear before the second resporident

on 27.09.2010 at 10:30 AM without £0;-‘therj_~ _

either through person__,..or_ throVu’g’h–:f?1iitho*rised

representative and file ob}”ectior1s’; ifddargdz’. _ ‘V ‘V A

vi) Second respondent hearing the joetitéivorrer and d”

b considerin the ob’ection_s fi1ed”if” an shall
Y S _ J , _ 3′
proceed to pass .appV_rof3ria’te’orde–i’s in accordance

‘D5′(‘fB