High Court Kerala High Court

Lakshmi.V.C vs Secretary To Government on 18 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Lakshmi.V.C vs Secretary To Government on 18 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33853 of 2008(E)


1. LAKSHMI.V.C.
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :18/11/2008

 O R D E R
                      P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

                   -------------------------------

                    W.P.(C) No.33853 of 2008

                   -------------------------------

                Dated this the 18th November, 2008.

                         J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri.A.V.M.Salahuddeen, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner, Sri.Alexander Thomas, the learned

Standing Counsel appearing for the Kerala Public Service

Commission, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’ for short

and Sri.P.Nandakumar, the learned Government Pleader

appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

2. The petitioner who belongs to a scheduled caste

community applied for appointment to the post of Anganwadi

Supervisor pursuant to the notification published by the

Commission in the Kerala Gazette dated 14.2.2008. The

petitioner’s grievance is that though she had applied within time,

the Commission has not issued a hall ticket to her to appear for

the examination. The petitioner further submits that the

examination is scheduled to be held on 20.11.2008 and that as

W.P.(C) No.33853/2008

2

she has applied in time, she may be permitted to appear for the

examination and that she may also be considered for selection.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

Commission submits that in the application form, the petitioner’s

date of birth is given as 20.1.1953 and her application was,

therefore, rejected as over aged. He further submits that going

by the application, the petitioner has completed the age of

superannuation, and is therefore ineligible to apply for the post.

A fax copy of the application was also made available to me for

perusal.

As the petitioner has attained 55 years of age,

which presently is the age of superannuation, the petitioner

cannot be granted the reliefs prayed for. The Writ Petition fails

and is accordingly dismissed.

P.N.RAVINDRAN,
JUDGE

nj.