Lakshmibai vs Syed Akabar on 9 February, 2009

 

IN THE HIGH COURT on KARNATAKJX' 41*}: if  

CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA "

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF'»VF.!§',BR?'uJ.I*"If_§Y:;.'V:£'.<O(V):9 

PRESENT;

THE HON'BLE'. MR JiISIiICE V;-G,SAIu3HAHIT"'  

THE HON'BLE M'R_.JUS'Vi'I'CES.:)5.SVZPACHHAAPURE

M.E.H; 
BETWEEN    

LAKSHMIBA1,    ~    
w/o.SIDDAPP.A PO'LICE«w..PA1'I1;,  .5 "
MAJOR, oCC.- OWNER on .fI"2\:_rA su.1yIQ;
R/o.H.N0;1'3;vI.I=§IeIASE§;'*  _
HOUSINGIVBOARD'AiA>fVl{!'i'..(v}i'§§)i1'§e"'1'¢I;'   4]

thereafter to Civil hospitai at Gulba1'g'Vé3LV._ff5r Shé: 

in-patient in the hospital t'rt)n1V1S:.€'?3:20Oi  It is hér
case that she was worlgzifig as&..V"a?;t;:~. and was
eanzixzg about Rs.4,500/--""p}:t'   she has suffered
permanent       the circumstances,

she has s0ugl;_t.--i{0f  '=:;£'f«:gs,s;»,95,ooo/- for pain and

sufieflng, n_3g_:dié31'€:{*;:g:x;_scs; .1_c§$s '0f.i11;:§omc etc,

3. In issued to the re$pondent~owner

and insurer  'vbeit_):té" the Tribunal and though the first

_.v:=:%s_pon(jiei?3.tVv;1:1ot filéwritten statement, the second zespondcni

fiir;d' the wriiténivstéiiement denying the averxncnts made disputing

  the   driving and the compensation ciaixncd as
   xaxiid "{II1I'€aSOI1&lbIf3'. On these grounds, the second

 séught far dismissal csf the petition.

 4. 5D11ring the enquiry, the claimant examined herseif as PW. 1

 

    '$335.1 Lung;-. .- __---



,,-,
..
--
n
a
v
I
.
r

 paynient.v'..':Ae-eerdingly, we answer points in afirmative and

h     appeal is allowed in part The appellant is entitled to

Veev.:'&'Vt0»talVVcompensation of Rs.1,-45,000/-- with interest at 9% on the

 

Rs. 30,000/-   'mental agony etc.,

Rs. 15,000,!"-4   expenses, attendant charges

 <5'f"ii1eome during the period of
tIea::V1nentg "v .; "  * -

Rs.8Cvi,'OQ()/f  ;t4'1"it.uLi'e'Ioss of income.

E
S
E
,3:
3;
2
3
3
3
E
é
g
Q
5
E
E
E

ORDER

‘>4

-1 VXVIVNHVM :10 12100.’) I-l9lH Vxvjvmn- –

.;5H’ CO1

NH V)lV.lVN¥V}i 50.1.3003 H91!-I V)lV.lV’l\-DH-N “‘ ‘”‘