High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Lallan Prasad vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 23 June, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Lallan Prasad vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 23 June, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                      CWJC No.7098 of 2011
                     LALLAN PRASAD SON OF LATE UMASHANKAR PRASAD,
                     RESIDENT OF KOSHI ROAD, WARD NO.10, SUPAUL, P.S.
                     AND DISTRICT- SUPAUL                      ........PETITIONER.
                                            Versus
                     1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL
                        SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION,
                        GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR.
                     2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY
                        DIVISION, MADHEPURA.                  .......RESPONDENTS.
                        For the petitioner:             Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate.
                        For the State:                  Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav,
                                                            Advocate.
                                            -----------

03. 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

for directing the respondent Executive Engineer to make

payment of due amount along with interest to the petitioner as

the petitioner being the contractor has finished the allotted work

in respect of which an amount of Rs. 2,26,000.00 is due with the

respondents without any valid reason.

3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to

approach the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division,

Madhepura(respondent no. 2) by way of filing an application

giving the detail of the amount dues. However, if such an

application is filed within 15 days from today before the said

authority along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall

decide the same by a speaking order within two months

thereafter. If any amount or interest is found admitted and

payable the same should be paid to the petitioner immediately
2

thereafter. However, if any amount or interest is not found

admitted and payable in the said order of the authority the

petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an

appropriate forum.

Devendra/                                         ( S.N. Hussain, J.)