IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 26031 of 2010(D)
1. LALU JOSEPH,
... Petitioner
2. CLETUS MARTIN,
Vs
1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. SISTER SALIS,
For Petitioner :SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
Dated :27/08/2010
O R D E R
S. Siri Jagan & M.L. Joseph Francis, JJ.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W.P(C) No. 26031 of 2010
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 27th day of August, 2010.
J U D G M E N T
Siri Jagan, J.
First petitioner is the owner of a property. The petitioners
replaced their old gate and constructed a new gate on 19-6-2010.
According to the petitioners, on a complaint filed by the 4th
respondent before respondents 2 and 3, respondents 2 and 3 are
harassing the petitioners, forcing them to demolish the new gate. The
petitioners therefore seek a direction to the 1st respondent to consider
Ext. P3 and take appropriate action to see that the petitioners are not
harassed and intimidated for demolishing the gate.
2. This Court directed the learned Government Pleader to get
instructions in the matter. The learned Government Pleader, on
instructions, submits that there is no harassment at the hands of
respondents 2 and 3. It is true that the petitioners and the 4th
respondent were summoned to the police station. But, learning that
the matter is a pure civil dispute, the police have relegated the parties
to their civil remedies and respondents 2 and 3 do not intend to take
further proceedings in the mater.
In view of the above submission, the same is recorded and the
writ petition is closed.
Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.
Sd/- M.L. Joseph Francis, Judge.
Tds/
[TRUE COPY]
P.S TO JUDGE.