High Court Kerala High Court

Laly Varghese vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Laly Varghese vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 259 of 2008()


1. LALY VARGHESE, LAL VIHAR, PLATHOTTAM,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. R.SULOCHANA, D/O. RAJAMMA,
3. SIVAKUMAR, S/O.RAJAMMA,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. K.S.SASIKUMAR, SECRETARY IN CHARGE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :17/01/2008

 O R D E R
                             R.BASANT, J
                      ------------------------------------
                        B.A.No.259 of 2008
                     -------------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008

                                  ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioners are the

Secretary, the loanee and a convenor of an administrative

committee of a Co-operative Society. The loanee allegedly made

an application for loan. That application was allowed and loan

was released to the said loanee. It is alleged that the loanee at

the relevant time had no title over the property which he had

pledged before the bank. The subsequent secretary in office filed

a private complaint which was referred by the learned Magistrate

to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Investigation is in

progress. The petitioners apprehend imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I

am satisfied that the petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail.

In the absence of opposition, I am not adverting to facts in any

greater detail. I take note of the submissions of the learned

Public Prosecutor that the loan has been repaid and the liability

has been discharged in full by now. Appropriate conditions can

B.A.No.259 of 2008 2

be imposed in the interests of a fair, efficient and expeditious

investigation.

3. In the result, the Bail Application is, allowed. The

following directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

i) The petitioners shall appear before the learned

Magistrate at 11 a.m on 24.01.2008. They shall be enlarged on

regular bail on their executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate;

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and

3 p.m on 25.01.08 and 28.01.08. During that period, the

Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioners in custody and take all necessary for the proper

conduct of the investigation. Thereafter the petitioners shall

make themselves available for interrogation before the

Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and 12 noon on all Mondays

and Fridays for a period of one month and subsequently the

petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as

and when directed by the Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

B.A.No.259 of 2008 3

iii) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law

as if those directions were not issued at all;

iv) If the petitioners were arrested prior to their surrender

on 24.01.2008 as directed in clause (1) above, they shall be

released from custody on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each without any sureties

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

24.01.2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-