Laxmiben vs 2.1 on 26 August, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/971/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION-FOR EXTENTION OF TIME No.971 of 2010
 

In


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 13501 of 2007
 

In
SECOND APPEAL No. 204 of 2007
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

=========================================
 

LAXMIBEN
PREMJIBHAI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

SATWARA
NONDHAN KHODA & 10 - Opponent(s)
 

========================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR KV
SHELAT for
Applicant(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2,1.2.3  
None for Opponent(s) : 1,
1.2.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3,1.3.4 - 2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3,
2.2.4,2.2.5 - 3, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5,3.2.6 - 4,4.2.1 -
5, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3,
5.3.4,5.3.5 - 6. 
MR PRAFUL VASAVADA for Opponent(s) : 6.1, 6.2
 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 26/04/2010 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

Rule.

Mr.

Praful Vasavada, learned advocate waives service of Rule for and on
behalf of contesting respondent Nos.6/1 and 6/2.

The
present application has been preferred by the applicants herein
original appellants for extention of a stay/interim relief which
has extended upto 23rd
April 2010 for a further period of four weeks. In the facts and
circumstances of the case the interim relief, which has been
continued upto 23rd
April 2010, is hereby directed to be continued upto 10th
May 2010.

Rule
is made absolute accordingly.

(M.R.

Shah, J.)

*menon

Top