Loading...

Leelamma Zacharia vs T.C.Joshi on 22 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
Leelamma Zacharia vs T.C.Joshi on 22 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 1515 of 2007(S)


1. LEELAMMA ZACHARIA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. T.C.JOSHI, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :22/02/2008

 O R D E R
                                 H.L.DATTU, C.J.   &   K.M.JOSEPH, J.

                                         ------------------------------------------

                                         Cont. Case (C)No.1515 of 2007

                                         ------------------------------------------

                                Dated, this the   22nd  day of February,  2008


                                                 JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu, C.J.

The only direction that was issued to the respondent by this Court was to

grant family pension to the petitioner ignoring the fact that she is receiving pension

from the Life Insurance Corporation of India, provided she is otherwise eligible.

2. Alleging that the respondent has not complied with the orders and

directions issued by this Court, the complainant is before us in this contempt

petition.

3. Sri.P.Parameswaran Nair, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing

for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that the respondent has now

complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court. He would further

state that payment order will be issued within a period of 15 days from the date of

receipt of a copy of this Court’s order. We do not doubt the correctness or

otherwise of the statement made by the learned Assistant Solicitor General.

4. In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Solicitor General,

the contempt proceedings are dropped for the present. However, liberty is reserved

to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need arises in future.

Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)

CHIEF JUSTICE

(K.M.JOSEPH)

JUDGE

vns

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information