Gujarat High Court High Court

Lehrunath vs State on 19 July, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Lehrunath vs State on 19 July, 2010
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/6854/2010	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 6854 of 2010
 

 
=========================================================

 

LEHRUNATH
SUHANATH MAHARAJ - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
SALIM M SAIYED for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR HL JANI, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

Date
: 19/07/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

Rule.

Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the
respondent State.

The
present application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for enlarging him on regular
in connection with the offence being CR No. I – 51 of 2009
registered with Pansila Police Station, District Surendranagar, for
the offence u/s. 380, 457, 114 of the I.P. Code.

Heard
learned Advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the
respondent. I have also perused the papers produced before me.
Learned APP has vehemently opposed this application. However, both
the parties do not press for any reasoned order.

Having
heard the learned Counsel for both the sides and looking to the
facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the witnesses,
gravity of the offence and quantum of punishment and the fact that
now the charge-sheet is filed, I am inclined to grant bail to the
applicant.

Considering
the above, this Application is allowed. The applicants are ordered
to be released on bail in connection with CR No. I – 51 – 2009
registered with Pansila Police Station, District Surendranagar, for
the offences alleged against him in this application on executing a
Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one solvent
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and
subject to the conditions that he shall –

a) not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;

b) not
to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or
complainant in any manner;

c) maintain
law and order and shall cooperate the Investigating Officers;

d) not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

e) not
leave the country without the prior permission of the concerned
Sessions Judge.

f) furnish
the address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the
time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence
without prior permission of this Court;

h) surrender
his passports, if any, to the lower Court within a week.

i) shall
mark his presence before the concerned police station at 11.00
O’clock sharp on 25th day of every English Calender month
till the trial is completed.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned
Sessions Judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would
be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the
solvency certificate if prayed for.

Rule
is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(Z.K.SAIYED,J.)

sas

   

Top