Lekhraj vs Shyam on 8 July, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/6856/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR AMENDMENT No. 6856 of 2010
 

In


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 10678 of 2009
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 630 of 1999
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
 
======================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
======================================


 

LEKHRAJ
MAGANJI VESTA - DHOBI - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

SHYAM
SUNDER CHHOTALAL NANDI & 2 - Respondents
 

======================================
Appearance : 
MR
BS PATEL for the Petitioner. 
MR NS DESAI for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR
VD PARGHI for Respondent(s) : 2, 
None for Respondent(s) : 3,3.2.1
 
====================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 08/07/2010 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

1. Rule.

Mr. Desai, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr.V.D.Parghi, learned advocate waives
service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2.

2. The
present application has been preferred by the applicant herein to
substitute the name and address of legal heir and representative of
Opponent No.3 as stated in Para-3.

3. Having
heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties, prayer in terms of para 5(B) is granted. Registry is
directed to amend the cause title in the main application
accordingly. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs.

[M.R.SHAH,J]

*dipti

Top