High Court Kerala High Court

Leo Uthuppan vs The Chief Passport Officer … on 12 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Leo Uthuppan vs The Chief Passport Officer … on 12 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32770 of 2008(A)


1. LEO UTHUPPAN, AGED 35 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CHIEF PASSPORT OFFICER (SECRETARY)
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJMOHAN R.PILLAI, CGC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :12/11/2008

 O R D E R
                                     V. GIRI, J.
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                        W.P.(C)No. 32770 OF 2008
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
               Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008

                                    JUDGMENT

Petitioner holds a passport as evidenced by Ext.P1. The place

of birth in his passport is shown as ‘Kulayatikara’, which is his native

place. But it seems that the petitioner was born in the ‘Caritas

Hospital, Thellakam’ as evidenced by Ext.P2. Therefore necessitates

correction in the place of birth as noted in the passport and for this

purpose, petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation. Though

earlier any such correction required a declaration by a court of

competent jurisdiction, the said procedure is now dispensed with as

is evidenced by Circular dated 18.04.01 referred to by the petitioner.

Petitioner also refers to another Circular dated 29.10.07 which

contemplates that the concerned passport officer can effect

correction in the matter of place of birth, date of birth and such other

related matters. I have considered a similar case and issued

directions in this regard, vide Ext.P7 judgment.

2. I heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner

Mr.C.C.Thomas and learned Central Government Standing Counsel

for the respondents.

W.P.(C)No. 32770 OF 2008
-:2:-

3. In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd

respondent to consider Ext.P3 and pass orders thereon in the matter

of correction of place of birth of the petitioner as entered in his

passport without further delay, at any rate, within six weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Since the petitioner is

working in Manipal, it will be appropriate that notice be given by the

2nd respondent requiring the petitioner to be present on a particular

day. Petitioner shall present himself on the said date as intimated by

the 2nd respondent. The above process will be completed within six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner

shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this

judgment before the 2nd respondent.

(V. GIRI, JUDGE)

ttb