.1'
IN THE HIGH coum' ore' KARNATAKA,
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY op' AUo*e:sT,;:oi'0e»
PRESENT "
THE HoN'BLs MR. J. s. eHi§=:FsIJs'fioE'
THE HoN'sL}3 MR3, J1;sTI€,s u1§r':ANJU:,A CHELLUR
BETWEEN:
Lingappa.s
S/0 RevéiI1x1a*»V ' . . :
Aged about . '
R/af:"Mt:dd2;ia11r{.a Paiya
Tavarekerew Hobli * ' ' ..
Bangalore SouthfTaILIk" ~ « . ~'
Bangalore " V VA " .
(B3.{ SI"i~. I). I5; Advocate)
'I'h_e Tahasildar
Bangéilore South Taluk
V Bangalore
'{Byt--S1'i. v. s. Hegde, AGA)
coo bio;
. . . COMPLAINANI'
. . ACCUSED
This contempt petition is filed under Sections 1 1
V' V8312 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 by complainant
wherein he prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to
initiate contempt proceedings against the accused for
willful disobedience of the order of this I-iorfble Court
dated 12.10.2009 passed in
W.P.No.27173/2009
{T ' émafl.
. 2 .
(KLR--RR/ SUR) vide Annexure-A, for non compliance of
the directioxzs of the Hon'b1e Court.
This C.C.C coming on for Orders
Justice passed the following: _
J.s.:e:I-IEHAR, C.J. [0ral]:_. %
Complainant / petitioner» approached Court
by filing w.P. NO.§§fF..173.]é'Q§*§-._V_ The arcrésaid writ L
petition was disposediwovf oz'def"5dai:ed 12. 10.2009.
A perusal d.fo1?veSé|id":o1§der--.~:dated 12.10.2009
reveaisd'ti1aifj:tI1eiifiaccdiised/fe_Spo§1dents were directed to
consider: ._ made by the
conjxplaixdldazmt/"ddated 20.11.2007 and pass an
o1ficler:'_A---dtherfieon H 3 months, from the date of
. the certified copy of the order dated
.2...mog.
Hari Shilpa, accused/respondent is
in Court in person. She has informed us, that
furtherance of the directions issued by this Court in
W.P.Nof’27173/2009 a notice was issued to the
complainant] petitioner requiring him to appear before
-mg’
. 3 .
the accused] responcient on 18.8.2010. it is pointed out
that a similar notice was issued to the opposite party. It
is also pointed out that the aforesaid nofice was”
upon the complainant] petitioner by tfoe
Accountant It is further submitted’ jtltle K V’
complainantf petitioner nor the _
for the hearing fixed for .It’.iei ” L»
out, that the aforesaid been..dei’e1Ted to
8.9.20 10, and that, petitioner
as also toe’ before the
accused] speaking order
will
3?…’ ‘ me fact, that the accused] respondent
steps for the compliance of the
by this Court on 12.10.2009 in we
No.27 Q3/2009, and in View of the statement made by
taccused/respondent, that a final oréer shall be
‘ after hearing the rival parties, We are satisfied
that it is not appropriate to retain this petition on the
board any further. The instant petition is accordingly
disposed of with a direc:t;’1on to the accused] respczgdsnt
to oemply with the undertaking given. to
expeditiously as possible. V
Disposed of accordingly.
fiC’}:1i’é4f Justice
11 ge