Lingaraju D S vs Marulasiddegowda on 1 December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 013"' DAY OF DECEMBER, :2a.1.B(:';«._«ByC~T..

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AQSEANE BeyR.;ARjg;;%bY:'ewvV 

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL 4NQO}2356     

BETWEEN:

Lingaraju D.S  .. .   
Adopted son of Smt. Gangémlrnig     
Aged about 43 years,    
Resident 0fDDdr1r_a'megi)wda,1ia -  V'

Koppaiu,----.K;£ha_l§a%i33:_  A ' ~-
Arsikere TaIALikf;V_..   _ .-
Hassafi: Di'3t1'icE     __ . . Appellant

(By Shri.   Advocate)

  1  CCCCC 

V'    

' S/07$:afmzi.rz1meg()wde1,
A'ged..'ab()u{ 62 years,

  .2.__ ..I;--a;1ithamma W/0 Marulappa

 Aged about 58 years.

 u Both are residing at Doddzlmetikurke,
 Kanakatte Pfobli, Ars;Ekez'e Taluk,

Hassan Di.ii:)Ced\ure, --.l'908,A"aga.i nstf the judgment and

decree dated"l'9.08':i2UO8"passed. in R.A.No. 69/2005 on the
file ofi'the"Civil_ iJitidgei{aSR;c_{jt';)i& Additional CJM, Arasikere,
dismissing the  a'i:t__i"::eitting aside the judgment and
decree dated 1'5.()7,20§_)5'«p'assed in O.S.No.437/2001 on the
file' efthe Add"it.ional Civil Judge (.lr.Dn) & JMFC, Arasikere.

 Second Appeal coming on for Orders this

   the,Cou':'t_idel_ive1'ed the following: --

JUDGMENT

ii The counsel for the appellant has remained absent

i=.Vce–n.s’isten.tly atleast on four occasions earlier. When the

” – “matter is called out today, {here is no representation on behalf

of the appellant.

ZS

The Counsel for the respondents is present and would
complain that the Counsel for the appeiianz has rem:1i’n..ed

absem continuously.

Accordingly, the appeal is disznissed,_:”‘»f9V1fl:’:1o:’a-

pr0seeL1ti0n.

{IV