1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED TI-HS THE OZND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOI-IAN REIjVE"Yj., COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 713 oF'..'2:'00é§: ' A I IN COMPANY PETITION N0. 4 oE~19'93'-._ BETWEEN: M/S. LLOYDS FINANCE LIMITEE No.76, KASTURI COMPLEX MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE -27-.._ _ REGD. OFFICE AT: UNIT NO.3, GROUND FLOOR : RAHEJA CENTRE,' p_O1N';j '' MUMBAI--~--4~00 02jI'.._ ' _ - ' ...APPLICANT (BY KLKILAW A/s;IfA§vs'§)A»2.EE A AND: I ~ LTD. [IN LIQN) _ A - REP.BY.fIHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR » y --. I A".['TACIj1ED_ TO THE HIGH COURT OF ' . MRNATA 2 E' »._4"VM/S\,'IN3DESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANKOF INDIA, JANARDHAN TOWERS I'F_L(DOR, 2 RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE ---- 25 " r,4REI?.BY ITS MANAGER. RESPONDENTS
DEEPAK 3: V JAYARAM, FOR OL)
‘ [BY M/S. KHAITAN & CO. ADV FOR R2)
‘E E’ * {R2 IS IMPLEADED VIDE C/O.DTD.5.6.08]
UK
I ‘Die. vtlie.a}:5p1icant thveflaforesaid assets,
2
THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 443(1)
OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULE 9 OF THE
COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULE 9 OF THE COMPANIES
[COURU RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE OFFICIAL
LIQUIDATOR WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE RESPONDENT
TO MAKE OVER TO THE APPLICANT THE ASSETS VOF_TIjlE
PETITIONER MOREFULLY DESCRIBED IN THE
HEREUNDER LYING IN THE PREMISES__;””O3€j_’
RESPONDENT.
THIS APPLICATION COMING .oiJ».FoR”§:’)fi1ji;’3i52.s; misc.’ I
DAY THE COURT MADE THE P’OLLiQWING:. * ‘ A
oagskgfl
This appiication is b3’/*.I.Ti0yds I”FirIiaiiceT2ELiiriited
claiming to be a 0f”tIIiIe: irililiauidation
for establishing of two at Dhenkeni
Kotta, Si5hai§£:iapTifi Tamil Nadu and
Buchiretiriy”PaIya:iii.;.’Neliigirbistrict. Andhra Pradesh, for
the relief of iiirec’tii*ig i;heTOfficial Liquidator to make over
,,..-
._ ‘I’?g5′:11~2009, the Oificial Liquidator was
I T . direcitedv’-.I:te”file a report as to whether he is in physical
T’~44fl.i)osisessibn of the Milk Chilling Plants. Although no
-I is filed, nevertheless the counsel for the Official
iii
3
Liquidator submits that the physical possession of the
two Chilling Plants were not either handed over to the
Official Liquidator nor was taken over by him.
3. There is no material on record to e_sta}oIislfi- .
existence of the two Milk Chilling. Plan_ts”‘or::’_’that it”
were handed over to the Officiial
direction issued by this sees es» wiihile i ”
winding up the Company. “in ‘ ”-~.,Cornpa11y E Petition
No.4/1998. Merely iivtpedtitioner has an
agreement foij lease and nothing
more cann0t.Vve§ren:L4’sjdg§e’st’remotedly that the Official
Liquidatour*.__is iii” _ee,sse§sien of the two Milk Chilling
“Application___is, accordingly, rejected.
sd/-
JUDGE
i.[f’»:/{st
