M A Sudhir Kumar S/O Sri M S … vs Mysore Mahanagara Palike Rep By … on 26 June, 2009

-1-

IN 'ms HIGH coum' or KARNA'I'A.KA,   A'

DATED THIS THE 25%: DAY:'Qi?'J{.IN'E,  T  

BEFORE Q V
THE HON'BLE MR.JUST]C)E,*.,R%M MG.H13'.N 

WRIT PETITION }'%o,V.336f.3""'(3=.§":'§'!C3£3fl8 (1.3-';E"AI's'.V):

MA sUDHIR%KU;91AR'  ,   
S/G SR1 M S AVNAN'1?_:HARAJA§AH._ 
AGED ABOU'? T48? YE?%;Rs," 'PARTNEiR"' '
M/S HOTEL_ RC)"i'.';'3L_I'NN;.._  '
565, BU£';i-HA MARGAE.   
SID£)HAii"f'i~I_A NA(iAR"~  _ _ '"
MYSORE-580~..{)1v1 -_ ' ~'

 -.    PE'I'i'I'iONER

  {i3=yV Evsaj S53}AS1>{0KHAfiANAHALL: ASSOCIATES )

-__-«.._

 --VM¥sém:: ":v;Ar~i}xNAGARA PALIKE
  REP BY COMMiSSi{)NER

1' V' * :§.?£Y3G§2F3 "

 RESPONDENT

(#5; M/S : M ? ASS’}’S.)

‘I’I~fiS WRYF PETITION IS FTLEQ UNDER ARTKILES 225

u “AND 227 OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF INILHA PRAYING TO

QUASH THE DIS’TRAiN’I’ WARRANT $31′. f2§.1.2{)O8 WEE
ANNEXA. AND ETC. »

N
E/k

\

-3…

In the light of Sections 470 and 471 of ti1.锑;;¥¢I;’

this petition is accordingly rejected.

In.