High Court Kerala High Court

M.A.Thomas vs State Bank Of Travancore on 5 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
M.A.Thomas vs State Bank Of Travancore on 5 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34800 of 2008(P)


1. M.A.THOMAS, (AUGUSTINE THOMAS), AGED 63
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, BRANCH OFFICE
                       ...       Respondent

2. CHIEF MANAGER (ADVANCES)/AUTHORISED

3. DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE,

4. THE DISTRICT LEVEL REHABILITATION

5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :05/12/2008

 O R D E R
         THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

            W.P.(C).No.34800 of 2008-P

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

     Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008.

                     JUDGMENT

1.The petitioner is facing proceedings under the

SARFAESI Act on account of failure to repay a

loan availed by him. According to him, he is

entitled to certain provisions by way of

rehabilitation through the DIC and certain

ameliorative measures by which the establishment

could be treated as sick and entitled to aid for

rejuvenation. Materials on record disclose that

there were meetings at the level of the DIC and

DLRC. As of now, the bank has made an offer to

the petitioner to consider a request for one time

settlement. This means that the petitioner has to

make a fresh application for one time settlement

and on consideration, he will have to abide by

the terms fixed by the bank for availing such

facility. On his paying the initial amounts for

WP(C)34800/08 -: 2 :-

the one time settlement after accepting the terms

thereof, the bank would also consider the

petitioner’s request for issuing a no objection

certificate for him to have his request before

the DIC and DLRC processed to enable him to have

his unit treated as one entitled to certain aid

by ameliorative measures treating his unit as a

sick one.

For the aforesaid reasons, preserving all

contentions of the petitioner and of the bank,

this writ petition is ordered directing that if

the petitioner makes his written application for

one time settlement within two weeks from now,

the bank will consider the same and intimate him

the terms on which it could be created upon.

Thereupon, the petitioner would pay the amounts

in terms of the one time settlement scheme and on

payment of the initial remittance due in terms

thereof, the bank will consider issuance of NOC

also. Coercive steps will stand deferred for one

month for the petitioner to work out what is

WP(C)34800/08 -: 3 :-

stated above. If the petitioner does not make his

written application for one time settlement or

abide by the terms offered by the bank for one

time settlement, the bank will be at liberty to

forthwith proceed with the distress action.

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE.

Sha/