High Court Kerala High Court

M.Abdul Hakkim vs The Asst. Provident Fund … on 26 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
M.Abdul Hakkim vs The Asst. Provident Fund … on 26 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 6313 of 2009(H)



1. M.ABDUL HAKKIM
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THE ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :26/02/2009

 O R D E R
                           ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                           ==============
                      W.P.(C) NO. 6313 OF 2009 (H)
                     ====================

               Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009

                              J U D G M E N T

Aggrieved by Ext.P1, an order passed by the 1st respondent

exercising his powers under Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Fund

and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before

the 2nd respondent accompanied by Ext.P3, praying for waiver of the

condition of pre-deposit and also for stay of Ext.P1. In this writ petition,

what the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider

and pass orders on Ext.P3, and in the meanwhile, to keep the recovery

proceedings, if any, in abeyance.

2. Although the standing counsel appearing for the respondents

object to the prayer made contending that money is due from the

petitioner in terms of Ext.P1, having regard to the fact that Ext.P3 petition

filed by the petitioner is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, I feel

at this stage, petitioner should not be saddled with the liability to pay the

amount due under Ext.P1.

3. Having regard to the submissions made, I dispose of this writ

petition with the following directions.

1) That the 2nd respondent shall within 8 weeks from today

WPC 6313/09
:2 :

consider and pass orders on Ext.P3.

2) It is directed that until orders are passed as above, further

proceedings for recovery of the amount due under Ext.P1 will be kept in

abeyance.

3) Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd

respondent for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp