High Court Kerala High Court

M.Aboobacker vs I.B.P.Company Ltd on 29 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
M.Aboobacker vs I.B.P.Company Ltd on 29 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 21364 of 2009(O)


1. M.ABOOBACKER, S/O.M.IBRAHIM
                      ...  Petitioner
2. FAIZAL, S/O. A.T.AMMAD HAJI

                        Vs



1. I.B.P.COMPANY LTD
                       ...       Respondent

2. I.B.P.COMPANY LTD

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN

 Dated :29/07/2009

 O R D E R
            S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
          -----------------------------
            W.P.(C).Nos. 21364, 21392,
           21404, 21405, 21406, 21407,
         21408, 21412 AND 21420 OF 2009
           --------------------------
      Dated this the 29th day of July 2009
     -------------------------------------

                     JUDGMENT

In all these writ petitions common

reliefs are claimed by the petitioners who have

filed separate suits for declaration that they are

dealers of the common first respondent and for

consequential injunction. Suits filed by them were

dismissed for default and thereafter they moved

applications for restoration. After hearing both

sides the restoration applications have not been

disposed is the grievance canvassed by the

petitioners invoking the supervisory jurisdiction

vested with this court under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India for appropriate directions /

orders to the court below for disposal of such

applications expeditiously.

W.P.C Nos.21364, 21392, 21404, 21405,
21406, 21407, 21408, 21412 AND
21420/2009 Page numbers

2. I heard the counsel on both sides. It

is submitted in a case of similar nature, this

court has already directed the court below to pass

orders on the restoration application which was

already heard by the court below as expeditiously

as possible at any rate, within a period of two

weeks. A similar direction is sought for in the

present petition also by the learned counsel for

the petitioners to which the learned counsel for

the respondents has no objection. I direct the

learned Munsiff to dispose the applications moved

by the petitioners / plaintiffs for restoration of

their respective suits as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within a period of two weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. Hand over a copy of the judgment to the

counsel on both sides on usual terms and transmit a

copy to the court below forthwith.

Sd/-

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,
JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE

vdv