High Court Kerala High Court

M.Asok Kumar Pandarathil vs Superintendent Of Police on 8 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
M.Asok Kumar Pandarathil vs Superintendent Of Police on 8 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32226 of 2010(C)


1. M.ASOK KUMAR PANDARATHIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.ANIL (K/1480/98)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :08/11/2010

 O R D E R
               K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
         ------------------------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.32226 of 2010-C
             ----------------------------------------------
          Dated, this the 8th day of November, 2010

                          J U D G M E N T

K.M.Joseph, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the

following reliefs:

“i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate

writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4

to afford adequate and sufficient police protection to

Muthuvazhy Subramonia Swamy Temple and its Poojari

and worshipers from the unknown anti social elements

who creates constant threat in the temple premise.

ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate

writ, order or direction directing the respondent to take

appropriate action on the matter so as to maintain the

law and order situation ensuring tranquility in the

locality.”

2. Briefly put,the case of the petitioner is as

follows. Petitioner is the Manager of the Muthuvazhy

Subramonia Swamy Temple and the said temple belongs to

their family. There is rumours spread in the locality that the

Thazhikakudom (dome) of the sanctum sanctorum of the

temple contains a valuable and very costly substance, there

WPC 32226/2010 -2-

happened series of occurrences for conducting robbery. Five

persons were arrested by the police and crime was registered.

The said matter is on the committal stage. Recently, there

occurred another unpleasant and terrible incident and because

of that terror the worshipers and Poojari are under fear.

3. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits as follows: There is a civil case pending between the

members of the family of the petitioner regarding the

ownership of the temple. In 2008 the Director of Archeology,

Thiruvananthapuram has requested the Superintendent of

Police, Alappuzha to provide security to the temple in view of

the fact that very valuable substance is found in the

Thazhikakudom. Beat Register has been established and

regular patrolling is being done. Attempt of theft was made

and that was thwarted on 16.6.2010. Learned Government

Pleader would further submit that effective patrolling is being

done and security measures are adopted so as to protect the

property of the temple. We record the submission of the

learned Government Pleader and dispose of the writ petition in

terms of the said submission. We make it clear that, it should

WPC 32226/2010 -3-

not be understood as meaning that we have pronounced on

any issue which is pending before the civil Court and the civil

Court is free to decide the matter untrammeled by anything

contained in this judgment. We further make it clear that, this

must not be treated as a pronouncement of any right in favour

of the petitioner who has approached this Court as between

the petitioner and any other party to civil suit. This judgment

shall not be looked into by the civil Court when the matter is

taken up the civil Court.

(K.M.JOSEPH)
JUDGE.

(M.C.HARI RANI)
JUDGE.

MS