M.Asokan vs Assistant Labour Officer on 3 April, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3115 of 2008(U)


1. M.ASOKAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, AGED 34,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. RAJAN, S/O.PALAYYAN, (REGISTER NO.
3. DIVAKARAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NADAR,
4. SOMAN, S/O.GOVINDAN,
5. ASOKAN, S/O.THANKAYYAN,
6. SURESH, S/O.MADHAVAN, (REG.NO.633/06),
7. SHAJI, S/O.DEVARAJ (REG. NO. 622/06),
8. RETNAKARAN, S/O.JOSHOW (REG.NO.
9. DASAYYAN, S/O.NARAYANAN
10. THANKARAJAN, S/O.KRISHNAN,
11. STANLY, S/O.GEORGE, (REG.NO.616/06),
12. SAJI, S/O.SOMAN, (REG.NO.629/06),
13. MOHANAN, S/O.YOHANNAN, (REG.NO. 626/06)

                        Vs



1. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. N.XAVIER, S/O.NALLATHAMPI,

4. K.PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.KUMARA PILLAI,

5. J.JOSEPH, S/O.JOHN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.G.SUDHEER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :03/04/2008

 O R D E R
                         S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
                     =======================
                      W.P.(C) No. 3115 of 2008(U)
                     =======================

                 Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2008


                           JUDGMENT

The petitioners claim to be head load workers of

Pazhinjikuzhi area in Perinkadavila Village. They submit that

they have submitted applications for registration under Rule 26 A

of Kerala Headload Workers Act and those applications have been

registered by the 2nd respondent, as evidenced from Ext.P1.

Petitioners’ contention is that their applications have not been

considered and orders passed yet. The respondents 3 to 5

submit that the petitioners are not employed as headload

workers of the area and they are not eligible for registration.

That is a matter which the 1st respondent has to consider while

passing orders on applications submitted by the petitioners for

registration. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is

disposed of with the following directions:

The 1st respondent shall consider and pass orders on the

applications submitted by the petitioners registered as per

W.P.(C) No. 3115/2008/U -2-

Ext.P1 and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at

any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment. The respondents 3 to 5 shall also be heard in the

matter before passing orders.

S.SIRI JAGAN,
JUDGE

jp